Not all bugs are bad
According to the hygiene hypothesis, we may have gone too far, too quickly, in our attempt to rid our lives of bugs, consequently leaving our immune systems out of sync with our suddenly squeaky clean lifestyles.
The fact that the human immune system is now redirecting its aggressive attentions onto non-threatening targets such as foods, and even attacking the body’s own tissues, is seen as a direct consequence of it being deprived of many of its traditional targets – bacteria, viruses and parasites.
The theory continues to attract support from research, such as that which has demonstrated an increase in asthma risk in cases where the stomach bug Helicobacter pylori has been eradicated. It is also known that inflammatory bowel disorders, such as Crohn’s disease, occur at a much higher rate in industrialised countries than in areas where gastrointestinal parasites are still common.
Return of the worm
A parasite said to its host,
“Though I am not trying to boast,
My favorite trick
Is making you sick,
So your health will be better than most.”
When a hayfever-prone researcher from Nottingham University’s School of Pharmacy contracted hookworms while on a field trip to New Guinea, the only obvious effect was that his sniffling, sneezing and sore eyes all cleared up.
Intrigued by the possibility that a parasite infection might cause a down-regulation of the overactive immune response seen in allergies and autoimmune diseases, the School of Pharmacy team launched a study of Necator americanus, a hookworm which has been living in humans for millions of years.
The leader of the team gave himself 50 worms, causing diarrhoea, but also proving that the treatment was otherwise safe, while the researcher who had first contracted hookworms continued to enjoy the benefits of a more modest colony, without any adverse effects.
In order to win ethical approval for clinical trials involving patients, the Nottingham team had to overcome the conventional wisdom that all bugs – and parasites in particular – are bad. Nevertheless, approval was eventually granted, and preliminary studies were carried out in subjects with respiratory diseases, before commencement of the current trial to assess the effects of a hookworm infection in patients with Crohn’s disease.
Necator americanus is clearly able to influence the human immune system and, while it is still not known exactly how it achieves this effect, some parts of the puzzle are beginning to fall into place. It appears, for example, that, in order to protect itself from attack by the body, the worm stimulates the mechanism which is responsible for keeping the immune system under control.
An immune response depends on T-cells, of which there are two types – bacteria-fighting T-helper 1, and the worm-fighting T-helper 2 cells. If the former overreact, the result is diseases like Crohn’s, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis. If, on the other hand, the latter cells overreact, allergies develop.
Controlling these two types of immune cell are the regulatory T-cells, which are able to shut down the other defence cells before they become too aggressive and cause harm to the body. What the hookworm appears to do is somehow to increase the population of regulatory T-cells, effectively reducing the immune response.
The Nottingham researchers are seeking to establish exactly how the hookworm achieves this effect, with the eventual aim of synthesizing whatever chemicals it produces and using these in the creation of more effective medicines to combat allergies and autoimmune diseases and prevent organ transplant rejection.
Given the attitude to parasites which is common amongst the population at the present time, drugs rather than the bugs themselves may seem a much more attractive proposition to many patients. However, in view of the track record of synthesized medicines for producing unpleasant and even harmful side effects there is much to be said for installing a living chemical factory in one’s gut which will produce the required medication on site, without interruption and without the risk of long-term side effects.
Desperately seeking infection
As someone who has multiple allergies and overwhelming food intolerance, as well perennial rhinitis, eczema and allergic asthma, I was very keen to obtain a hookworm infection after hearing about the Nottingham project.
I could, of course, have travelled to where the worms are endemic and picked up a hookworm infection by walking around barefoot in open air latrines, but the dose is difficult to control when obtained in this way and one can easily pick up something less desirable in the process.
The silver lining to my eventual diagnosis of Crohn’s disease was that this provided eligibility for inclusion in the 2006-2009 trial of hookworms in patients with this disorder, and I wasted no time in taking advantage of this opportunity.
At my first session at the Wolfson Digestive Diseases Centre at the Queen’s Medical Centre in Nottingham, the project was explained in detail by Paul Fortun, the trial team leader, and my suitability for the study was assessed. After this, all of which took place in the ‘Bored Room’, I was examined in another room designated the ‘Hide and Caecum’! (The professor leading this department clearly has a sense of humour, further evidenced by other signs, including those on the door of the room used by the department’s two technicians. One sign, high up on the door, reads, “High Tech”, and another, at the bottom, “Low Tech”.)
At the next session, a small amount of liquid was dispensed onto a plaster which was then applied to my arm. Contained within the liquid were either ten microscopic worm larvae, or a small quantity of histamine to act as a placebo by imitating the itch caused by the larvae as they make their way through the skin.
Which of these ‘treatments’ I received was dependent on whether I had been assigned to the active treatment group or the placebo group but, as this was a double-blinded trial, this detail was not revealed to me, nor known by the medical staff involved.
Living with wriggly lodgers
I settled into a routine of diary-keeping and of hospital visits every three weeks for blood tests and the completion of more questionnaires, while waiting for the worms – if these were what I had been given – to take up residence in my gut.
If I had received hookworm larvae, these would travel first, via my blood stream, from their point of entry on my arm to my lungs. They would then hitch a ride on the upward-moving escalator of hairs lining my airways, before being swallowed, passing through my stomach, and finally settling in pairs in the lower reaches of my small intestine. And all without the aid of a satnav!
As the worms are still minute when they make this epic journey, the host is blissfully unaware of any of their activity. Even when fully grown, this species of hookworm only reaches approximately 1 cm long and, although it survives by drawing blood, this is also undetectable by the host, and the amount taken is miniscule.
There is no danger of the worms proliferating in the host, and normal sanitation and hygiene procedures ensure that no infection is passed on to others. The eggs produced by the adult worms only become infectious after they have left the gut of the host and gone through a further stage of growth in soil. In order for a transfer of infection to take place, the next generation of larvae must then be picked up from the ground on bare skin, several days after the eggs were deposited.
The benefits of gut buddies
Quite suddenly, at about the fourth week of the trial, my bowel habits normalised somewhat and abdominal discomfort decreased. Itching at eczema sites eased, sleep improved, my perennial rhinitis dried up completely and a persistent nocturnal throat irritation also improved, completing the impressive list of chronic symptoms which were unexpectedly ameliorated.
What I was hoping for most was to regain some tolerance to normal foods but, eating small amounts of a few common foods (instead of my usual semi-elemental diet) produced only disappointing results initially. However, later in the trial period, several foods which had previously caused a variety of symptoms – including bloating, nausea and abdominal soreness, increased fatigue, headache and inappropriate shivering – began to produce less severe symptoms and, in a few cases, no symptoms at all.
Following eradication treatment at the end of the active phase of the trial, all the positive changes were reversed and I was forced to return to a solely semi-elemental diet, leaving me to ponder whether the benefits had all been due to the placebo effect, or whether I had actually found a remarkably simple solution to many of my health problems.
In order to further assess the possibility that this treatment might be of long-term benefit in my battle with multiple allergy and food intolerance, I began negotiations with my gastroenterologist and the trial team in the hope of securing a reinfection with Necator. It eventually transpired, however, that this would not be possible, but this was by no means the end of the story, which continues here.
Worm therapy opportunities
At the time of the Crohn’s trial, many questions remained to be answered about helminthic therapy, such as what the ideal number of worms might be, and whether top-up doses may be required during the normal five-year life span of the hookworm. Researchers were even considering whether eradication and replacement of the worms every few months might be more effective than leaving them in place long term, although this is now known not to be helpful.
Further studies to try to answer these and other questions are currently in progress at Nottingham and other trials are being carried out in collaboration with researchers elsewhere in the world. A study in asthma patients has already been completed by the Nottingham team, as has one exploring the link between hookworm and allergy, and studies in Australia are focussing on coeliac disease, while a trial is about to begin at Nottingham to assess the therapy’s value in multiple sclerosis.
Would-be worm hosts who are not eligible for a clinical trial could always aquire an infection the natural way, by walking barefoot on faeces-infected ground in a part of the world where hookworms are endemic, as did one adventurous worm hunter who was desperate to cure his asthma. Details of the exploits of this brave pioneer can be read in his practical guide to the use of hookworms in the treatment of asthma and hay fever.
Fortunately, a safer and more convenient option now exists, thanks to Autoimmune Therapies, who offer controlled doses of Necator to would-be worm hosts worldwide, with the exception of the US, where shipping of hookworm has been effectively banned by the FDA, who have bizarrely declared hookworm to be a ‘drug’.
* An explanation of the theoretical framework supporting helminthic therapy.
* An explanation of helminthic therapy and a large collection of good research papers.
* For information on the use of helminthic therapy with specific diseases, go to PubMed and enter “helminth” plus the name of the disease you’re interested in.
* For up-to-the-minute discussion on all matters helminthic, visit the Yahoo Helminthic Therapy Forum. The group also hosts a collection of dozens of good research papers (click on the Files link on the left after registering).
For a fascinating and amusing read on the subject of our complex, and sometimes comical relationship with pathogens and parasites, see ‘Riddled With Life: Friendly Worms, Ladybug Sex and The Parasites That Make Us Who We Are’ by Marlene Zuk, published by Harcourt. For those who wish to purchase this infectious read, there is a link at this review.
NB: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.