Archive for the ‘Articles’ Category

No more restless legs!

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

Restless Leg Syndrome (aka ‘Ekbom’s Syndrome’) was a problem for me for many years.

Having M.E./Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, I desperately needed all the rest I could get and relied on a good sleep at night and two lengthy periods of deep relaxation/meditation during my waking hours in order to get through the day without feeling too dreadful.

But, as my health steadily declined, I began to develop a tendency to become uncontrollably restless just as I was going to sleep, and also after I’d been meditating for 10 or 15 minutes, a situation that threatened to scupper the energetic equilibrium that I was already having to work so hard to maintain.

I reported the problem – which mostly affected my right leg – to my GP, but he didn’t recognise any specific condition and could only suggest that I take sleeping tablets to knock me out at night, and prescribed an …azepam drug, which was fine for one night, but, if I took it for more than two nights, it actually made the problem worse.

When I returned to see the doctor, after doing some homework, I was able to give him detailed information about Restless Leg Syndrome, which was clearly the problem I was experiencing. He admitted that he had not heard of this, but he was willing to learn and, together, we explored several therapeutic approaches. Unfortunately, none proved successful.

I then tried electroacupuncture – again unsuccessfully – and sought, but could not find, an osteopath familiar with the use of the Dalrymple pump technique, which I had heard might help.

The usual nutritional approaches – taking magnesium, calcium and potassium, and avoiding caffeine – didn’t work either, nor did vitamin E or a strong B complex formulation, nor even drinking tonic water (for the quinine). And, as the problem got worse, I began to find that drugs taken for other conditions, such as metoclopramide to treat gastroparesis, could dramatically worsen the symptoms.

It was at this point that I first encountered hookworm, a development that was eventually to transform my health in many ways.

So many of my multifarious symptoms disappeared or were significantly reduced after getting ‘hooked’ that I was overcome by all the remarkable improvements I was enjoying, and didn’t immediately notice the actual moment of cessation of several of these, my restless legs included.

I was looking at a list of autoimmune diseases when I happened to notice that RLS was among the 150-plus diseases included, and the realisation suddenly dawned that this – one of ‘my conditions’ – was no longer a problem for me. I was almost as shocked to acknowledge that I hadn’t noticed its passing as I was relieved that it was finally gone.

I immediately looked up the record I had begun after getting my hookworm, and found that references to RLS began to reduce rapidly from the fifth week post inoculation. There was no record at all of restlessness from weeks 6 to 10, only a few mild episodes between weeks 10 and 19, and then absolutely nothing from then onwards!

It’s now 18 months since I adopted my treasured harem of hookies, and there has been no sign at all of any restlessness in my legs since week 19, a fact about which I am even more relieved, having just read that, in the absence of other effective medical options, doctors have recently begun to use the drug Qualaquin to treat RLS.

Qualaquin is approved for the treatment of a type of malaria, not RLS, and it has the potential to adversely affect almost every body system. The list of its effects includes permanent kidney damage, deafness, blindness, cardiovascular problems, severe nose bleeds, dizziness, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. The FDA have already released a statement alerting consumers to these dangers, after receiving a slew of reports of side effects including serious and life-threatening reactions.

My hookworm initially caused some temporary gastric symptoms, particularly diarrhoea, but the small number I have will never cause any worse effect than this, so I’m hugely relieved that I discovered them before my GP got round to suggesting I try Qualaquin!

A diet for optimum health

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

The impact on our health of what we eat has long been played down by mainstream healthcare, in spite of considerable research demonstrating the connection, such as the recent study showing a link between multiple sclerosis and diet.

The truth about the importance of diet for health is now at last becoming more widely realised, but only since the advent of the internet and amongst those with the discernment, or luck, to find the nuggets of truth among the boulders of misinformation.

Unfortunately, government agencies still often issue dietary advice that is flawed, or aimed at the wrong target, as in the report recently released by the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) saying that junk food high in saturated and trans fats and salt is responsible for thousands of unnecessary deaths.

While it is true that processed trans fats are bad news, a far greater problem is created by sugar and refined carbohydrates, which are arguably the most important driver of chronic disease today, but this truth is effectively kept under wraps by the efforts of a very powerful sugar lobby, a situation that is repeated across the entire dietary spectrum.

Fortunately, a new approach has cast fresh light onto all of this confusion by offering an alternative to flawed official information and commercially-driven dietary guidance.

A leading UK nutritionist has carried out a large survey to establish exactly which foods are associated with optimal health, surveying over 55,000 Britons to compare subjective ratings of health with consumption of specific food groups in order to derive a research-based guideline for healthy eating.

Whereas most research into diet and health compares diet intakes with the prevalence of diagnosed diseases, the online ‘100% Health Survey’ – the largest ever comprehensive health and diet survey carried out in Britain – has, uniquely, compared the diets of those in robust health with those who have a plethora of health issues that may reasonably be expected to progress to disease unless the underlying causes are addressed.

The results show how the sub-optimal health that is the lot of so many today is closely related to diet, and reveal exactly which types of food are associated with good and poor health.

Foods most frequently associated with good health

* Nuts and seeds
* Fresh fruit
* Vegetables/salad
* Oily fish
* Water

Foods linked to neither really good nor really bad health

* Red meat
* Restaurant/processed meals
* Refined foods
* Tea, coffee and cola

Foods most frequently associated with poor health

* Dairy products
* Added sugar
* Wheat
* Salt
* Sugar-based snacks

Consumption of sugary snacks and drinks was by far the best predictor of poor health for every measure of health looked at (energy, digestion, immunity, hormonal and mental health), confirming that sugar is the worst of the ‘bad’ foods – much worse than alcohol or salt. In fact, indulging in sweets and sugary snacks more than double one’s chances of being in poor health, while avoiding them will make one six times more likely to enjoy optimal health.

These findings cut across much conventional dietary wisdom. For example, nuts and seeds, which are often avoided today because of their fat and calorie content, come up as excellent predictors of good health, and both wheat and milk, which are considered by many to be staples and are in almost every form of convenience food, are shown to be associated with poor health.

Another surprise was the impact of alcohol. Results showed that those drinking a unit of alcohol a day, eg a small glass of wine, were less likely to be in poor health than abstainers, although this relationship does not hold up for larger amounts of alcohol.

Collating all the data from the survey, the following general dietary recommendations emerged.

* Increase consumption of fresh, raw seeds and nuts to 3 servings per day.

* Increase consumption of fresh fruit and vegetables to a combined total of 8-10 servings a day.

* Increase consumption of oily fish to 3 servings per week.

* Increase consumption of water to 8 glasses per day (approximately 1.5 litres).

* Reduce the consumption of red meat to a maximum of 2 servings per week, particularly those already in poor digestive health.

* Minimise the consumption of restaurant and processed meals.

* Reduce consumption of refined foods (white bread, flour and rice etc.) to a maximum of 1 serving per day.

* Eliminate tea, coffee and cola consumption or limit these to very occasional use.

* Reduce dairy product consumption to a maximum of 1 serving per day.

* Avoid adding sugar to food or drinks.

* Reduce wheat consumption to a maximum of 1 serving per day (bread, pasta, pizza etc.)

* Avoid adding salt to food.

* Eliminate sugar-based snacks (chocolate bars, biscuits, etc.) or limit these products to very occasional use.

Advocates of the Paleolithic Diet will note with interest the fact that the top six food types identified by this study as being most associated with good health are essentially the same as those eaten by our early human ancestors.

One of the reasons why this type of diet is so good for us is likely to be that adopting a diet for which our digestive system is best adapted alters the balance of our indigenous microbes, favouring intestinal bacteria that are most beneficial to us.

Babies need friendly bugs

Saturday, June 26th, 2010

A baby starts life with a sterile gut but, during birth, it becomes inoculated with bacteria from the birth canal. These bacteria are then encouraged to flourish throughout the gut by colostrum, the mother’s first milk.

Unfortunately, modern medicine effectively deprives many babies of a significant part of their bacterial birthright by carrying out caesarian births (Babies’ First Bacteria Depend On Birthing Method), a loss which may then be compounded by subsequent bottle feeding (Breast Milk Sugars Give Infants a Protective Coat) and have health implications such as an increased risk of allergies and asthma.

Eighty per cent of the immune system is gut-associated, and maternally-derived probiotics are essential for healthy immune programming. There is also no easy way to belatedly reclaim the benefits lost as a result of c-section births, because no other bacterial source can quite match the donation of a complete microflora from one’s mother.

Only bacteria that have been pre-programmed within one body are fully accepted into the intestines of another, and able to survive there long-term. Probiotics that have been artificially cultured tend not to successfully colonise the gut, and must be taken on a regular basis, often indefinitely.

Nevertheless, there is clear evidence that at least some probiotics can and do offer significant benefits to babies, as is evident from the following recent research.

Probiotics help preemies gain weight

In a recent study, extremely premature infants whose food was supplemented with Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium infantis had better weight gain than infants who were not given the supplements.

Based on their findings, the researchers hypothesize that infants who receive probiotic-supplemented feedings should be able to tolerate a larger volume of food each day, gain weight faster and require fewer days of antimicrobial treatment.

Probiotics reduce crying time in infants with colic

After only one week of supplementation with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri Protectis, the daily crying time of infants with colic was reduced 74%, compared with only 38% in the placebo group.

At the end of the study, 84% of the supplemented infants had resolved their colic (dropped to less than three hours of crying), a significantly greater number than the 43% of the placebo group who experienced a similar improvement.

Probiotics may prevent allergy in infants

When a probiotic E. coli strain was administered to infants of allergic mothers within 48 hours of birth, and then 3 times each week for 4 weeks, allergy symptoms developed in only 2 of the treated babies, compared with 14 in the untreated group.

The probiotic employed in this study may therefore be an effective means of allergy prevention in infants of allergic mothers.

Infancy is not the only stage of development in which beneficial bacteria have a valuable role to play in promoting child health. Giving microbes to pregnant women may benefit their offspring, and probiotics continue to be of value to children as they grow past infancy.

Probiotic drink reduces infections in children in daycare

Studies in other countries have already established that probiotics can produce positive health benefits in children, including a reduction in the number of school days missed due to infections.

In a recent US study, which was funded by The Dannon Company, Inc., makers of the functional food tested in the trial, a 19 percent decrease of common infections was found among the children who took the drink.

Consumption of the strawberry yogurt-like drink DanActive (containing the probiotic strain L. casei DN-114 001) produced a 24% reduction in gastrointestinal infections, resulting in less diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, and 18% fewer upper respiratory tract infections (such as ear infections, sinusitis and strep), although, in this trial, the reduction in infections did not result in fewer missed school days or activities.

Related posts:

Breast milk probiotic may help ease gut disorders.

Kefir benefits the sickest young children on antibiotics.

Good bugs prevent colds and flu.

‘Friendly’ bacteria: side-lined healers.

Getting real about antibiotics.

What happens when the good guys disappear?

Fifteen months of relief from food intolerance and fatigue

Sunday, May 30th, 2010

It’s now 15 months since I acquired a team of 35 hookworm to keep my errant immune system in check, and I’m still over the moon with the results – very much enjoying having more energy and being able to eat many normal foods again.

After having had my original cohort of hookworm for six months, I added whipworm and have recently also taken on board another 10 hookworm, in pursuit of hopefully even greater benefits, though it’s too early yet to be sure exactly what, if any help these additions will produce.

At the moment, I’m very much enjoying my new diet. I’ve recently started to make my own kefir (more ‘old friends’ but, this time, of the bacterial variety!) and I’m also eating more food raw, after finding that my gut feels even more comfortable on a raw food diet. Most of my diet is now normal food, and I never eat more than 30 per cent of the special semi-elemental feed that had for so long been my sole sustenance.

On the strength of my experience so far, others with similar problems are beginning to take the plunge and get ‘hooked’ themselves. A very good friend who has the same extreme degree of food intolerance – as well as MS and M.E. (CFIDS) – recently inoculated with hookworm and, after a rather rough ride with the temporary gastric symptoms that can occur in the first few weeks after inoculation with this species, is already feeling better than she has for many years and is just now starting to eat normal foods again.

What has amazed me, when she and I have compared notes, is how uncannily similar her progress has been to my own, with milestones being passed in the same sequence, and at very close to the same timing.

I began to experience a sense of well-being for the first time at about 30 days post inoculation with hookworm, my friend at 43 days. I began suddenly and unexpectedly to take an interest in cooking smells for the first time in many years at day 39, and she observed herself responding unusually positively to seeing food on the TV at 47 days. I experienced real hunger for the first time at 43 days, and she reported feeling the first pangs of hunger at 60 days – and now describes herself as ‘ravenous’! It’s the same pattern, just delayed by a couple of weeks in her case, and she’s recently also said that her temperature control has been a lot better since week 6, and that she’s now needing a lot less sleep, which, again, mirrors my own experience.

I find all of this truly amazing. My own story could easily have been just a one-off case, but add my friend’s almost identical experience, and the whole thing becomes so much more significant.

Hookworm vaccine: double-edged sword

Friday, April 30th, 2010

Reading the information on the development of the hookworm vaccine may fill most readers with the warm glow that comes from the belief that yet another medical milestone is about to be passed en route to a disease-free world. My own response, however, is one of absolute horror!

Once this vaccine is available, it will certainly have the potential to reduce the anaemia and protein malnutrition suffered by more than a half-billion people worldwide who are infected with hookworm but, assuming that it is effective, it will totally wipe out the worm burdens of all those individuals who receive it. And, if it is effective, long-term, these people may never again be able to host hookworm, and therein lies a very significant problem.

There is a clear link between a lack of intestinal worms and many of the worst diseases of modern Western civilization – devastating autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, as well as allergies, some of which can kill in a few moments via anaphylaxis. And there is also growing evidence that replacing a controlled number of intestinal worms, such as hookworm, can effectively treat these same diseases.

The difference between disease causation and disease remediation is numbers. Many hundreds of worms will cause problems, and the more there are, the bigger these problems will be. However, less than a hundred worms will not cause any health problems, but will provide effective protection against inflammation, allergy and autoimmune disease.

Surely, it would be far more sensible to seek better ways to control the numbers of hookworm being hosted by individuals rather than wipe then out completely. But this kind of thinking is anathema to medical authorities around the world, who are now hell-bent on getting rid of what they can only perceive as a threat.

Not surprisingly, the authorities are being eagerly encouraged in this endeavour by the pharmaceutical multinationals who have realised that vaccines offer them the opportunity to sell drugs not only to the sick, but also to the well. Hence the huge increase in the number of vaccines currently being developed and pressed upon a largely unsuspecting public.

Where all this madness will end is anyone’s guess, but treating hookworm infections using vaccines will likely result in millions of people developing autoimmune diseases, which they will not be able to treat using controlled numbers of hookworm because they have been vaccinated against this organism.

Had I been given this vaccine, I would not have been able to experience the relief from my allergies, chronic fatigue, and Crohn’s disease that the acquisition of a few hookworm has produced. So, from my perspective, the deployment of a hookworm vaccine has the potential to create a nightmare scenario. The only positive side to the development will be the inevitable financial rewards for those who happen to work for, or have shares in the company that manufactures the vaccine!

Quite apart from the above considerations, there are also many question marks hanging over the safety of vaccines in general. These products are a veritable witch’s brew of toxic elements, and medical professionals are continually revealing confronting statistics showing the darker reality of what vaccines may actually do to those who receive them.

Unfortunately, so far as the hookworm vaccine is concerned, the commercial momentum is probably now unstoppable. The only hope for the unsuspecting millions who will be given this vaccine is that it will prove less effective in the long term, in the same way that the mumps vaccine has proven to be ineffective, with protection levels falling off very quickly after administration. I certainly hope that this will be the case!

Related article:

Swine flu vaccine: do you really want it?

Getting real about antibiotics

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

While taking an antibiotic can, in some circumstances, be a life-saving intervention, it will also inevitably lay waste vast numbers of indigenous intestinal microorganisms – a loss from which we may only slowly, and possibly never completely recover, as less desirable organisms can win control in the repopulation process.

Our gut microbiota represents a ’second genome’ that is essential to our health, and any bacterial imbalance can have long-term consequences, due to the fact that we rely on beneficial bacteria to perform a number of crucial tasks such as digesting food, manufacturing vitamins and protecting us from invading pathogens.

When the normal, healthy balance of bacteria is knocked off kilter in the aftermath of antibiotics, the stage may be set for the development of a range of diseases, including Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, food intolerance, and even obesity.

In addition to this, any use of antibiotics has the potential to encourage drug resistance on the part of bacteria, leading to the possible development of new ’superbugs’.

Until recently, the process by which antibiotic resistance develops had been thought to be a passive phenomenon, occurring when a mutation or a bit of newly acquired DNA enables a microbe to evade the effects of antibiotics or render them harmless. Natural selection was thought to then allow these particular microbes to outcompete their non-resistant peers.

However, in the last 6 years, researchers have discovered that mutation rates in bacteria may respond to other factors, such as the production of free radicals in response to antibiotics, which can then cause mutations in bacterial DNA, including some that happen to cause resistance.

A new study explains how this can occur as a result of using lower strength, non-lethal antibiotic concentrations, and how the resulting resistance may not be limited to the particular antibiotic used, but affect other antibiotics as well.

Put simply, antibiotics are not only selecting specific mutations, they are actually causing them.

And the issue of increased antibiotic resistance is not just a problem in clinical settings, but also in the wider environment. New evidence shows that even soil microbes have become progressively more resistant to antibiotics over the last 60 years, and that this has even occurred in the Netherlands in spite of stringent rules on the use of antibiotics in medicine and agriculture and improvements to sewage treatment technology.

It’s clearly a no-brainer that antibiotics should be reserved for life-threatening situations, rather than being squandered on every run-of-the-mill infection that develops. And it also seems madness to continue to allow the value of these drugs in combatting serious infection to be compromised by routinely injecting chickens and dosing pigs and cattle to promote animal growth and producer profits, when the result is low-level exposure to all who eat these animals. While Europe now eschews the use of antibiotics for growth promotion, US farmers apparently remain unpersuaded about the need for this change.

There is really no need to use antibiotics for everyday infections in humans because there are effective natural alternatives to pharmaceutical antibiotics which are ideal for this purpose.

Arguably the best natural antibiotic is colloidal silver, which is actually far safer, more effective and less expensive than the side effect-laden mainstream antibiotics, contrary to the disinformation about this substance that continues to be regurgitatied by mainstream medicine. Even the best and strongest of FDA-approved antibiotics are only effective for a handful of bacteria at best, whereas colloidal silver is effective on a much broader scale and can kill even the most deadly pathogens. Used sensibly, colloidal silver is entirely harmless to humans and it does not create resistance or immunity in the pathogens it kills.

Additional effective, safe and cheap natural antibiotics have recently been discovered in the form of essential oils, which are even able to combat drug-resistant hospital superbugs. Thyme and cinnamon were found to be particularly efficient against a range of Staphylococcus species, with thyme being able to almost completely eliminate bacteria within 60 minutes.

Clearly, the best course is to avoid infection in the first place, and a healthy diet and healthy lifestyle will go a long way towards this goal by enhancing immunity. In particular, the optimisation of one’s vitamin D level will effectively seal the fate of most marauding pathogens, as demonstrated by this must-read article. And vitamin D is very ably supported by vitamin C, a very potent nutrient that continues to be cold-shouldered by mainstream medicine as a result of the double standards applied by Western medicine when assessing the efficacy of vitamins compared with pharmaceutical drugs.

Probiotics can also assist in preventing infection, as shown by yet another new study that has added further data in support of this approach, which is both safe and non-invasive, and does not create bacterial resistance. Moreover, it was found that not only are harmless probiotics able to protect animals against falling prey to pathogenic bacteria, but they can also treat an existing infection, and can do so as effectively as the best available antibiotics.

Finally, if you want a vital and vigilant immune system, be careful what pharmaceutical drugs you take, as some can prevent the body’s attempts to fight invading organisms. For example, the statin drug, simvastatin, which is widely prescribed to prevent cardiovascular disease, actually impairs the ability of macrophages to kill pathogens, and then, in a double whammy, it goes on to enhance the production of cytokines that trigger and sustain inflammation.

Related articles:

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics – avoid like the plague

Kefir benefits the sickest young children on antibiotics

Good bugs prevent colds and flu

‘Friendly’ bacteria: side-lined healers

The Nottingham Hookworm For Crohn’s Disease Trial

Friday, March 5th, 2010

‘An appetite for worms’ is an updated version of a report that first appeared in mid 2008. It briefly outlines the hygiene hypothesis and the biology of hookworm therapy before detailing my introduction to helminthic therapy as a subject in the Hookworm for Crohn’s Disease Trial at Nottingham.

This trial is now complete and it shouldn’t be too long before the results are made available, although I don’t expect that these will provide any new insights on the efficacy of hookworm in the treatment of Crohn’s disease because the number of worms used (10) and the length of time these were left in place (12 weeks) were not sufficient to provide significant therapeutic benefit.

The purpose of the trial was to provide a further incremental step in the evidential foundation that the Nottingham team is gradually laying to pave the way for possibly one day using this approach in the treatment of allergic and autoimmune disease, although their ultimate aim is to identify exactly what the hookworm does, chemically, to remedy these conditions.

Once this is known, the research is likely to switch to the production and testing of a drug rather than the use of living helminths – something which, in my own view, would actually be a retrograde step, in view of the lack of long term side effects produced by the worms, and the likelihood of much more severe side effects from any synthetic drug.

Anyway, here’s the article: An appetite for worms.

Autoimmune disease or aspartame poisoning?

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Some people diagnosed with lupus, MS, diabetes and other diseases have found that their symptoms have disappeared when they stopped consuming products containing the artificial sweetener aspartame.

However, avoiding aspartame may be difficult, as this sweetener can be found in approximately 6,000 products worldwide, including soft drinks, chewing gum, confections, gelatins, dessert mixes, puddings and fillings, frozen desserts, yogurt, tabletop sweeteners, pharmaceuticals and vitamin products.

Those who promote aspartame claim that it helps people achieve a more healthy diet by reducing or replacing the calories in foods and beverages while maintaining great taste. Its advocates point to the fact that simply substituting a can of diet soft drink for a regular soft drink can save 150 calories, and that substituting a packet of low-calorie tabletop sweetener for two teaspoons of sugar three times each day – in coffee and tea, and on cereal etc. – can save 100 calories a day.

But all this hype covers up a quite different reality and a very sorry tale of deliberate deception on the part of big business and government in both the US and Europe. The truth is that aspartame is an addictive, excitoneurotoxic, genetically engineered carcinogen that interacts with virtually all medications!

The story of aspartame is laid bare in the movie ‘Sweet Misery’ – the film that Pepsi and Coca Cola didn’t want us to see, but which is now available, in entirety, on the internet.

Those who decide to avoid aspartame after watching this film need to be aware that a new derivative of this sweetener has been introduced by NutraSweet. Called Neotame, the new product is already availiable in the US and has recently been approved for sale in Europe.

The makers of Neotame are promoting their product to manufacturers by pointing to such attributes as its great taste, zero calories and the fact that it’s 8,000 times sweeter than sucrose. They also draw attention to reduced handling charges, shipping and storage costs that will, they say, deliver commercial users significant savings on sweetener formulations. So Neotame is clearly going to sweeten the profits of Europe’s as well as America’s food and drink manufacturing companies, but what will it do you you and me?

Well, it may allow manufacturers to reduce the amount of high-fructose corn syrup in their products, which could be good news but, as Neotame is a modified version of aspartame, and has a very close chemical relationship to the original, this new, ‘improved’ version is likely to carry similar health risks.

Anyone wondering if there is an artificial sweetener which doesn’t carry the risks attached to aspartame and similar compounds should look at stevia, a completely natural, sweet substance that is grown in soil rather than being concocted in a laboratory.

The erosion of choice in healthcare

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

Those who frequent the Yahoo Helminthic Therapy forum will know that, in early November, 2009, the US Food and Drug Administrtation moved against Autoimmune Therapies, the company that supplies therapeutic doses of hookworm and whipworm to individuals who wish to use these organisms as a treatment for allergy and autoimmune disorders.

By declaring these natural ‘probiotics’ to be pharmaceuticals, the FDA effectively ended AIT’s production and shipping of helminths from within the US but, with no other company anywhere in the world able to supply these particular organisms to the scores of very sick individuals who need them, Jasper Lawrence and his colleagues were determined to continue to meet their obligations to customers, so Jasper was left with no option but to abandon his home, and leave family and friends in order to relocate in haste to another country.

Shortly after this event, I heard of two somewhat similar cases in which small companies selling completely natural products have been prosecuted by government agencies.

A small US farmer selling unadulterated, raw milk – as drunk by humans since animals were first domesticated – was prosecuted after a sting operation by a local Health Department, and a small UK firm selling a sleep-aid made solely from common grasses was prosecuted by local Trading Standards officials in Wales.

Unfortunately, these are not isolated incidents, but just further examples of the steady – one might even say stealthy – erosion of the choices available to individuals who prefer alternative or natural approaches to healthcare. And, sadly, the vast majority of citizens in the US and Europe are blissfully unaware of what is taking place.

Those who are not already aware of the situation will find enlightenment in these two blogs by Jon Barron – Alternative Health – Now You See It, Now You Don’t and Nutritional Freedom, the Frog in the Water.

I feel sure that, one day, justice and common sense will prevail and consumers will assert their right to have whatever form of healing they choose for themselves, but it could be a long time yet before this happens and things may well get much more difficult in the meantime.

Those who ask what can be done about this situation might care to examine the work of Dr Joseph Mercola, whose website has been the most visited natural medicine site in the world for the last seven years, and is now also in the top ten most visited general health sites.

In the last year, mercola.com has been instrumental in educating the public about the truth behind the Swine Flu debacle. In partnership with the National Vaccine Information Centre, mercola.com helped avoid the use of squalene in the H1N1 vaccine in the US, as well as helping to prevent mandatory H1N1 vaccination, and saving the majority of US citizens from being duped by the massive PR media campaigns into accepting an unsafe and ineffective vaccine.

This is just one example of what can be achieved when individuals are appropriately informed and enabled by the internet to make a stand against scheming corporations and a clueless government, and I urge everyone who cares about maintaining freedom of choice in healthcare to join the Mercola online community and/or to bookmark the Mercola Natural Health Newsletter (or RSS link) and the Mercola Vital Votes Blog (or RSS link).

This will keep you up to date with the latest news on health and provide sound, impartial advice on how to maintain your well-being by the most natural means possible. It will also keep you abreast of the activities of those who would sacrifice your health for dubious motives. The latter are clearly stealing some of the skirmishes but, if they go on to win the war, it will be because we have let them!

As for the three companies mentioned above, the prosecution of the Bechard family by the Missouri State Milk Board and Attorney General for selling raw milk in contravention of state regulations is ongoing. The Welsh sleep-aid manufacturer is now getting back on its feet following its prosecution, and has already picked up an award for its reformulated product, Asphalia, which I can personally vouch for as a remarkably effective and side effect-free sleep-aid. Autoimmune Therapies, meanwhile, have completed the relocation of their production department and should begin shipping hookworm again this week, with whipworm to follow in a few weeks time.

Gut bacteria play a crucial role in food intolerance

Saturday, December 26th, 2009

Medicine still has no ready solution for the problem of food intolerance and, in general, doctors have shown little interest in finding one. In the absence of medical help and with no test for the condition, most patients are left to search alone, often in vain, for answers, and for whatever scant relief they can find.

A few doctors, such as allergist Prof. Jonathan Brostoff and gastroenterologist Prof. John Hunter, have taken more of an interest in this condition, and published very helpful books (The Complete Guide to Food Allergy and Intolerance and Solve your Food Intolerance respectively), but these doctors are very much the exception.

For those who don’t want to have to purchase and read their way through a book, Prof. Hunter, and agri-food scientist Karen Huntley, have recently condensed the wisdom gained from many years of clinical practice and research at the Gastroenterology Research Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, into an online article (The Management of Multiple Food Intolerances).

The authors assert that food intolerance is caused by undigested food residues being wrongly metabolised by gut bacteria, and explain how this situation can best be managed by using means such as an elimination and/or rotation diet, a liquid elemental diet, fibre reduction, small, frequent meals, careful chewing or blending of foods and taking pancreatic enzymes and probiotics while avoiding prebiotics and antibiotics. Also discussed are the benefits of breath retraining, psychotherapy, EFT and meditation, and the merits of using laxatives and bowel washouts.

In spite of the remarkable breadth of the authors’ approach to food intolerance, this does not yet extend to the use of helminths, about which they were apparently unaware until their attention was drawn recently to my own very successful experience of using helminthic therapy for this condition (Wriggling out of food intolerance and fatigue).

Unfortunately, when doctors are made aware of this option, many tend to be extremely resistant to the idea of replacing even small, controlled doses of organisms which their training has conditioned them to perceive only in an extremely negative light. However, given Prof Hunter’s demonstration, over many years, of the critical importance of gut fauna in the development and management of food intolerance, the idea of using a few additional organisms that have a glowing therapeutic track record should not present too great a leap of imagination.

It is possible that the success of helminthic therapy in treating my own severe food intolerance may be due not just to the effect of the worms on my immune system but also to their effect on the composition and integrity of my gut microbiota, and it seems to me that the use of helminths may be a much more straightforward, powerful and elegant solution to the problem than the collection of measures which Prof. Hunter and his colleague advocate.

Wriggling out of food intolerance and fatigue

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

Taking part in the Hookworms for Crohn’s Disease trial at Nottingham University in 2007 had provided me with a brief but tantalising glimpse of how my health might be improved by hosting a small colony of benign intestinal worms, and I was determined to acquire a long-term infection as soon as possible.

To this end, I had secured the agreement of my gastroenterologist, who referred me back to the trial team for reinfection. However, in spite of an earlier indication that they would be willing to provide me with a further dose of hookworm, the trial coordinator then told me that this would not be possible until the study was complete.

This was a considerable disappointment because the trial was taking an inordinately long time – probably due to difficulty finding sufficient volunteers willing to host a small worm colony – and it became clear that the trial would not be complete until the middle of 2009.

In the meantime, I had required further bowel surgery, to repair yet more Crohn’s-related intestinal strictures, and I was still unable to eat any normal foods due to multiple allergies and overwhelming food intolerance, not to mention having a number of other long-term health problems, including M.E., a subgroup of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome characterised by inordinately exaggerated exhaustion following any activity, either physical or mental.

I was becoming impatient… (continued)

‘Friendly’ bacteria: side-lined healers

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

Of the 100 trillion ‘friendly’ bacteria, from hundreds of different species, that we each carry around in our gut, only a few may have a special role in shaping our immune responses, but one of this select group involved in immune regulation may have been found recently, in the form of a little-known bacterial species called segmented filamentous bacterium.

This ‘master’ bacterium is the first example to be found of a commensal bacterium that can simultaneously orchestrate a large spectrum of intestinal immune responses – both innate and adaptive, pro-inflammatory and regulatory – to create an immune barrier in the gut.

It can single-handedly initiate immune cell responses in mice that normally require the concerted efforts of the entire mouse microbiota and, by so doing, effectively protect mice from illness caused by an intestinal pathogen.

There is also now further evidence of the ability of ‘friendly’ gut bacteria to not only help fight infection, but also do so while maintaining a fine balance between over- and under-stimulating the immune system.

Research is also ongoing into the development of modified probiotics that can divert gut pathogens away from vulnerable intestinal cells. By adding to harmless gut bacteria molecular mimics of the sugar receptors displayed on the walls of intestinal cells, the researchers have succeeded in duping the infamous E. coli O157 pathogen into attaching to the bacteria rather than the cells, to provide 100% protection against this otherwise fatal disease.

Recent evidence to support the therapeutic use of simpler, unmodified probiotics includes Dutch research which found that treating pregnant mothers, and then their infants, with particular strains of probiotics may help prevent eczema in children with a family history of allergies.

Research conducted in China has also recently found that probiotic dietary supplementation during the winter months was a safe and effective prophylaxis against colds and influenza in children, reducing fever, rhinorrhoea and cough incidence, as well as the need for antibiotics and the number of missed school days attributable to illness. When children in the study who were taking probiotics did get fevers, coughs or runny noses, they recovered significantly faster than untreated peers.

While the Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis strains used in this latter study were both independently effective, the best results were obtained when the two types of bacterium were combined, hinting at the possibility that the use of multiple species of organism may be preferable in the case of bacterial therapy, as it appears to be in helminthic therapy.

All this recent work adds to a substantial body of existing evidence for the therapeutic effects of probiotics, just some of which is mentioned below.

Probiotics can help fight the stomach bug Helocobacter pylori, benefit the sickest young children on antibiotics, ease antibiotic diarrhoea, and may help reduce salmonella infection.

Probiotics have been shown to be active against inflammation in models of arthritis and salmonella infection, to ease colic in breastfed babies, normalise bowel frequency in IBS patients, improve health in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, help reduce obesity, ease ulcerative colitis, and promote oral health.

Ultimately, it may be the case that many of the ills to which our own species falls prey could be amenable to the ministrations of commensal bacteria, and with less side effects than are associated with the isolated synthetic molecules which are the mainstay of medicine today.

Yet, however attractive this idea may be to those who are ill, and however encouraging the results above, the reality is that the latter constitute only a trickle when compared with the veritable torrent of research being conducted into patentable synthetic pharmaceuticals.

Currently, medicine appears to be rather less interested in pursuing probiotic research than is the food industry, for whom functional foods – including dairy products containing probiotics – are their fastest-growing product group.

Unfortunately, the dominance of the profit motive in medical research leaves little appetite for exploration of the lost world within us, so, at the present rate of progress, it could be many decades before we understand our own microbiome sufficiently to fully capitalize on the therapeutic potential of the organisms within it.

An approach which obviates the need to identify individual beneficial bacterial species is faecal bacteriotherapy, which employs the most complete mix of human-derived probiotic bacteria possible – the entire faecal flora of a healthy human being. Already shown to be successful against ulcerative colitis, this treatment should arguably be subject to further formal trials for this and other diseases.

This approach has been around for a number of years, but has failed to capture the attention of clinicians, perhaps due to the nature of the protocol (detailed here) which some may find repugnant. This is a great pity because the therapy is low-tech, low-cost, minimally invasive, and offers perhaps the ultimate bacterial probiotic.

Whilst we are forced to rely on manufacturers to provide us with probiotics in supplement form – which usually contain only one or two strains of a very limited number of bacterial species, and are invariably expensive – the all-in-one probiotic delivered by faecal bacteriotherapy is available free, and acquiring it is within the capability of any moderately adventurous and resourceful individual. Given a willing, healthy donor and some basic equipment, this procedure is ripe for self-administration, using the rectal delivery route. Anyone who can perform colonic irrigation, should be able to manage this.

This option is therefore something which those with ulcerative colitis may wish to consider, although helminthic therapy using whipworms remains the first choice for this condition, as there is already much preliminary scientific evidence supporting its use. It is also convenient and has produced excellent results in those who have tried it thus far.

Swine flu vaccine: do you really want it?

Saturday, September 26th, 2009

The European drugs regulator has given the go-ahead for one of the UK’s two swine flu vaccines – Pandemrix, made by GlaxoSmithKline – for use in adults and children over six months and pregnant women, and the Department of Health plans to start vaccination in October.

The GSK vaccine is made in eggs, so is not suitable for anyone with an allergy to egg, but the second vaccine – to be available soon and made by Baxter – is not manufactured using eggs so can be used in people with an egg allergy. More…

Flu vaccines also typically contain one or more of the following toxic/hazardous ingredients: thimerosal (mercury, which causes nerve cell damage), aluminum (a neurotoxin that has been linked to Alzheimer’s disease and may be involved in Multiple Sclerosis), squalene (an adjuvant which generates concentrated, unremitting immune responses over long periods of time), Triton X-100 (a detergent), phenol (carbolic acid), ethylene glycol (antifreeze), betapropiolactone (a disinfectant), nonoxynol (used on condoms to kill or stop growth of STDs) and octoxinol 9 (a vaginal spermicide).

Although, according to reports, the GSK Pandemrix vaccine ‘appears safe’, nearly 50% of people in one of the key studies experienced local discomfort or systemic symptoms – i.e. headaches – and it is unlikely that the long-term effects of this vaccine have been determined in the couple of months that evaluation has been carried out.

The vaccine used during the swine flu outbreak in 1976 increased the risk of developing Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) by eight times and led to 500 people succumbing to this syndrome, 25 of whom died before the immunisation programme was halted.

No-one has ever figured out why the 1976 vaccine caused this disease – in which the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks the nerves – and doctors have again been advised to watch for Guillain-Barré syndrome during the current swine flu vaccination programme.

According to a study released by the British Medical Journal, more than half of Hong Kong’s healthcare workers have said they would refuse the swine flu vaccine because of side effects and doubt about its safety and effectiveness. The study suggested that health workers worldwide were likely to repeat this trend.

As an alternative to a vaccine, a daily dose of 800-2000 IU of vitamin D has been shown to more or less eliminate flu symptoms. Vitamin C is also a surprisingly effective prophylactic against viral infections such as swine flu and, if delivered intravenously, will safely and effectively treat the illness, if contracted.

Further information:

More on vitamin D…

More on vitamin C and swine flu…

Other preventive measures…

Face masks are effective…

Swine flu: the phony war…

More on swine flu vaccine…

Rhinitis can ruin your sex life, but a few worms may restore it!

Monday, September 14th, 2009

Many of us who suffer from nasal allergies have long known that even the simple act of kissing can be compromised by frequent sneezing, a blocked nose and, worst of all, by post-nasal drip. Now, at last, research has finally caught up with reality and confirmed our experience.

When polled for this new study, 83 percent of people with allergic rhinitis said it affected their sexual activity at least sometimes, with almost 18 percent of those affected saying that their allergies nearly always got in the way of a satisfying sex life.

Itchy eyes and other allergy symptoms can be extremely distracting and make a person feel less than sexy and, if embarrassment caused by many of the other aspects of rhinitis doesn’t cramp one’s style, tiredness from chronic loss of sleep, induced by nasal blockage, almost certainly will.

A friend of mine who spent many years trying unsuccessfully to get help from the UK medical profession for his rhinitis and the problems that it caused, finally found that the only solution was a small dose of tiny worms!

Dave (not his real name) had had rhinitis from childhood, but had managed to live with it well into adulthood before it began to have a major impact on his life. His nose would physically swell up and block, and this prevented him from sleeping and left him extremely exhausted.

He tried everything that his GP offered, but the latter finally told him he would just have to live with the problem! Only after constant baggering of the GP was an appointment arranged for Dave to see a specialist, but this proved to be just another dead end, as did several further consultations with private specialists.

Dave struggled valliantly to hold down his job, although his work inevitably suffered because of his constant tiredness. His performance in other areas also suffered, and his wife eventually left him. At that point, he felt he had nowhere to turn and nothing left to live for, so took an overdose. Fortunatley, this was discovered in time and, as this type of acute problem is something the medics are good at dealing with, he survived.

Shortly after this, I told Dave about my recent therapeutic inoculation with hookworm and how this had completely cleared my own nasal congestion. He didn’t hesitate, despite the significant cost of the treatment, and promptly ordered a dose of hookworm from Autoimmune Therapies.

“Anyone who doesn’t try this,” he said, “isn’t suffering enough!”

After the few weeks that it took for his worms to mature, he began to improve, and I began to get almost daily excited phone calls with updates about his progress.

To cut a long story short, his life has been transformed. He can now once again breathe freely through his nose and he sleeps like a baby – right through the night. His job is going really well and he now also has a new girl friend. In short, he’s ‘full of the joys of Spring’, and all thanks to a few little buddies living in his gut!

This remarkable new treatment, which can turn lives around but which most doctors still know nothing about – and a few are violently opposed to – is called Helminthic Therapy, and involves aquiring a small, controlled dose of tiny (less than a centimetre long), harmless intestinal worms that have co-evolved with our own species for millions of years and which are therefore fully adapted to us – and we to them – but which our modern sanitation practices effectively banished from our lives several decades ago.

Dave and I have both found that having these amazing little creatures back inside us is a simple but very effective long-term solution to nasal problems as well as other forms of allergy, with none of the harmful side effects of regular medical treatments, which, in both our cases, had proved ineffecitve anyway.

Now that we have realised the remarkable benefits of hosting a few carefully selected beneficial organisms, neither of us will ever willingly be parted from our new ‘old friends’.

We’re still suckers for a Trojan horse

Saturday, August 15th, 2009

As each new piece of technology appears on the horizon, we embrace it without question and add it to the ever-growing collection of ‘must have’ gizmos that adorn our lives. Perhaps, however, we should be a little more circumspect about what we adopt.

When I first moved into a house with an inside loo, I was overcome with joy that I would no longer have to empty my chamber pot each morning into the tippler at the far end of the yard. And our tippler was quite a posh affair – a fully enclosed, brick-built ‘thunder box’, unlike the more usual, ramshackle wooden structures. Users of the latter would relate stories about how they had had their posteriors pecked by hens while answering the call of nature, or prodded with sticks by local miscreants looking for a quick giggle.

An indoor flush toilet was just the most amazing thing, and little did I realise, back then, that this technology might actually be involved in the causation of the eventual collapse of my health, of years of pain, and the loss of a job that I loved dearly. I knew nothing at that time about the effect on the parasitic worm cycle of sanitation and the wearing of shoes, and their consequent relationship with allergy and autoimmune disease.

I never even questioned why I didn’t have worms like those that my aunt had told me she had pulled from her anus on one occasion. I just thought that such things were, like chamber pots and tipplers, ‘of the past’, and good riddance to them! Only now, after reintroducing worms to my intestines and beginning to regain a degree of health that I had come to think impossible, have I realised the price that we in the West have paid for using flush toilets and wearing shoes.

Another contributor to the steep learning curve that I have experienced recently is a realisation about the effects on human health of the plethora of microwave-emitting electronic devices, on which many in the West have now come to rely.

Soon after I installed Wi-Fi in my home, and I began enjoying the freedom provided by this, I noticed that, whenever I used my laptop computer on my knee for any length of time, my legs began to tingle, and this was certainly not due to the weight of the laptop. I wondered if it might be the heat but, eventually, discovered that the tingling stopped when I disabled the Wi-Fi function on the laptop.

This led to a series of related discoveries, including the fact that my DECT telephone was bathing me and my family in microwave radiation 24/7!

The Wi-Fi went into the bin and I switched to a dLAN internet connection which works via the household power main. The DECT phone was replaced by an alternative which only emits radiation when it is actually being used, and I now use a wired land-line phone whenever I can. 

Prompted by this experience, I began to research the whole issue of radio-frequency radiation, and was, frankly, astounded by what I discovered. This article looks at most of the many sources of microwave radiation to which we are now exposed, the effects which these can have on humans, and what we can do to protect ourselves. 

It is now clear that we need to be constantly vigilant when assessing new technologies, whatever form they may take, and adopt a skeptical approach to protestations about safety from manufacturers and representatives of the UK and US governmental and medical establishments in particular, especially as the latter have yet to take any action at all on radio-frequency radiation… and still insist that mercury dental fillings and the fluoridation of public water supplies are both completely safe.

In spite of our obvious technological sophistication, we are still, physiologically, simple hunter-gatherers, biologically unadapted to many aspects of twenty-first century ‘civilization’, such as diet, sedentary working practices, the absence of parasites and exposure to ubiquitous industrial pollution. We ignore this reality at our peril.

Related post:

Cell phones and their threat to health