Archive for the ‘Psychology’ Category

Happiness

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

An abbreviated list of what makes people happy includes:  You have to find out what is true for you, so most happiness advice is only true most of the time.  Happiness is a way to travel, with a life filled with frequent, simple, small, positive experiences.  Happy people have reasonable status, are both technically and socially competent, and are successful.  They have low stress and feelings of guilt, get enough sleep, have good perceived health, access to nature, and a sense of control over their lives.  Community, spirituality, and good individual relationships are important for happiness.  Living under a good government is important.  It helps immensely if you love your work.  Happy people are optimistic and grateful.  Symbiotes can help.  For the rest of the details read below.  

The advice in this post should be used in the same way clinics often use psychological assessment tests.  (For examples, see Psychological testing – Wikipedia, Psychological Test List, and Neuropsych Tests)  A client comes in, and for the first few days he is given a whole battery of tests covering just about everything imaginable.  Then a counselor sits down with him, goes over the results, they narrow down where the problem areas are, and then they proceed from there.  Some of the advice in this post will be in tension with other advice in it.  For example, “You should delay gratification for greater rewards in the long run.” versus “Try to live in the moment, not in the past or future.”  The way to think about this is that there are many ways in which people can be less than fully functional.  So, you’ll need to tailor any advice to your life by reasonably applying it to your specific situation.  If you tend to worry excessively, you will need to try to worry less, and learn to take reasonable risks for the greater gains.  But if you’re a risk freak, then you might need to work at being more cautious.  The first step then is to take stock and ask yourself the question, “What in my life is causing me problems?” and tailor your approach accordingly.  Also, don’t fall into the trap of becoming a slave to any “happiness advice rules.”  Be flexible, generally act in moderation, and do what works for you.

What a person brings to life (their personality, likes and dislikes, abilities, temperament, skills, and habits) determines their happiness to a fair degree, and therefore to some degree our happiness is out of our control.  For example, our inborn degree of extroversion is an important variable in determining our happiness.  Relative to the current range of environmental variation (1), about 50% of people’s happiness depends on their genes.  But, this leaves us with the other 50% to work with, which allows a lot of room for improvement.  Approximately 10% of the total is a result of various identifiable life circumstances, such as health, SES, marital status, and income.  And 40% is some combination of unknown factors, along with the actions that individuals intentionally take to make themselves happier, or not.    

If you want to intentionally work at improving your happiness one thing you need to develop is a looking-down-on-yourself-as-a-subject metaperspective on your life.  So a good habit is to keep a happiness diary.  You need to figure out what’s true for you.  Because we often know our own nature better than others do, and often have our own interests more at heart, a good general rule is that people who set their own agendas in life are often happier than those who don’t or can’t.  This is one of the reasons why freedom and happiness correlate.  Another reason is that freedom implies status and respect in a community, because the fact that you can’t make choices to the same degree as your peers is often a sign of inferior status.  So you need to know yourself, and be able to act on that knowledge, to fashion a life that’s grounded in what’s best for you. (2)  But, having said this, unlimited freedom isn’t the ideal state either.  Routines are comfortable and familiar, and help us by limiting our choices.  Research shows that although people believe they want endless variety and choice, they’re actually happier with somewhat more limited options, otherwise they can become overwhelmed.  As with many things, freedom also needs to be in moderation.

However, there’s one problem with the plan of finding out what’s true for us.  As bad as other people are at running our lives, we aren’t necessarily very good either.  (It’s just that other people are generally even worse.)  It turns out that people are quite bad at predicting what will make them happy. (Stumbling on Happiness by Daniel Gilbert)  They consistently remember bad things in the past as worse than they were at the time, and they make the same mistakes over and over in predicting how various hypothetical circumstances will affect their happiness.  For example, when people are asked how happy would they be if they were paraplegic many people predict they would be miserable.  It turns out that, while parapaglics might be not quite as happy as before, they often aren’t miserable.  The reason they aren’t miserable is that we don’t react to the world as it is, but to how we perceive it, and we have some control over this.  People are very good at adapting to bad things by changing how they see the world, and our inability to account for this when given some hypothetical explains why our imaginations fail us.  One way to fight this tendency is to ask people who are actually in the hypothesized situation how happy they are.  This turns out to be a better predictor than a person’s introspection usually is.  So, even though people vary in what will make them happy, the average of other’s experience is still better than we can do in predicting how happy we will be in some situation we’ve never experienced.  This is why it’s important to try all sorts of things for ourselves, because through this process we find out who we are, and what works for us.  If you think about it, it shouldn’t be the least bit surprising that people are bad at knowing what will make them happy.  If people were actually good at this, then there wouldn’t be much point in doing happiness research.        

As many people have said, “Happiness is a way to travel, not a place to get to.”  Along these lines one key to happiness is setting up your life so that you generally have something good to look forward to.  Living in this way supports optimism, and also dovetails with the finding that happiness tends to grow out of small, frequent, regular, and dependable positive experiences,  which are habits that are part of a routine.  As such, a person’s happiness can often be best understood by looking at how their ongoing activities operate in their life.  A change in a person’s life that involves pursuing a goal or engaging in a new activity (joining a club, beginning a new hobby, learning a new skill, changing careers, making new friends) will usually change a person’s happiness for a long time, because they are now in a constantly changing environment that provides a series of novel happiness enhancing experiences.  By contrast, even an important change in a person’s material circumstances (getting a new house or new car) will usually result in only a temporary rise in happiness.  This is because people become acclimated to the static facts of their new lifestyle as they roughly have the same experience over and over.  (Why Are Some People Happier Than Others? by Sonja Lyubomirsky)  This contrast highlights the fact that happiness generally doesn’t grow out of possessing things, but out of doing things. (3)  Dr. Michael Fordyce summarizes the idea that happiness often grows out of a series of small positive doing-things experiences by employing what he calls the “Time Clock Theory of Happiness,” and argues that a person’s happiness is largely determined by the content of their thoughts over time. (Happiness Research Website)  What this suggests is that you should try to find simple pleasures you enjoy and distribute them throughout your day. (4)  (Savor the Little things – Zen Habits)  If a person regularly engages in activities such as having sex with someone they love, spending time with friends, relaxing, learning new and interesting things, challenging herself with new projects, and meditating (Meditation – Lost Wanderer) she will probably be happier.  And if she can limit distasteful activities, such as long commutes and boring or stressful work, it’s so much the better.

In addition to simple pleasures, there are a number of general factors that for many people tend to color their overall life satisfaction: regularly getting a good night’s sleep, having a low level of stress (since stress tends to maintain depression) (How NOT to Multitask – Work Simpler and Saner – Zen Habits), living in quiet surroundings (Stress and Noise - Resources for Science Learning – The Franklin Institute), having high self-perceived health (5), engaging with nature, and having respectable statusDepression tends to be associated with social rejection and emotional isolation (6), living in fear, unrelievable pain, and having a low sense of control over your life.  Dr. Steven Ilardi, in his book, “The Depression Cure,” argues that our transition from the hunter-gatherer lifestyle to modern civilization created a mismatch between our biology and the environment that reduced our happiness.  Some of his recommendations are that we should consume at least 1 gram/day of omega-3 fatty acid (because it’s anti-inflammatory)  (For example, see Natural Factors Omega-3 Pharmaceutical Grade Fish Oil – Lost Wanderer), get enough sleep (most people need 8 hours/day) (7) (Sleep Related Topics – Lost Wanderer and Sleeping Like a Hunter-Gatherer – Lost Wanderer), eat a healthy diet (The Paleolithic diet – Lost Wanderer), exercise (Move Natural Exercise – Lost Wanderer, Pole Dancing & Belly Dancing are Good Workouts – Lost Wanderer, Lifting Depression by Kelly Lambert – Lost Wanderer, RossTraining.com, and Conditioning Research), and get 30+ minutes of sunshine/day. (8)  Another very important factor I can add to his list is our natural biological symbiotes, such as various helminths and protozoa, which we need in order to function normally, and lost during our transition to modernity.  For example, the common soil bacterium Mycobacterium vaccae seems to have strong antidepressant effects, which might help explain why so many people enjoy gardening. (Is Dirt the New Prozac - Discover Magazine, See also, We Need Our Symbiotes – Lost Wanderer)  Johns Hopkins researchers have written that a majority of subjects in a 2006 experiment reported an increase in life satisfaction over a year after taking psilocybin a single time.  Many of the volunteers described the experience as an especially spiritually significant one.  (Magic Mushrooms – Lost Wanderer)  Another natural antidepressant of note might very well be semen. (Semen acts as an Anti-depressant – Lost Wanderer)  And some of the natural environmental stressors people used to be exposed to might also be very helpful.  (Adapted cold shower as a potential treatment for depression – Lost Wanderer)   

The evidence for the relationship between money and happiness is mixed, and sorting out all the confounding variables will take researchers some time.  National income has greatly risen in the last 50 years, but national happiness levels haven’t changed.  (I suspect that this is because if everyone is on average richer, then no one’s relative status has changed, and status is often the reason why having money is important for happiness.)  The happiest states are the poorest ones, and the least happy are the richest.  Yet, rich people are happier than poor people, (My guess is that this is mostly because rich people have higher status and they have a greater sense of accomplishment.) and rich countries are happier than poor ones. (Rich countries generally have more honest governments.  See below, “trust and confidence in their government.”)  What researchers can say right now about money is that having lots of it usually won’t make you happy, because it has rapidly diminishing returns past some point.  It seems that money helps if it can be used to access those things that increase happiness, and to reduce those things that lead to unhappiness.  So, if someone can use a raise to get enough sleep, eat a healthier diet, have a greater sense of personal freedom, etc., it might very well help.  And if that raise can be used to reduce or remove pain, stress, insecurity, anxiety, being trapped in a job you hate, not being able to get good health care, having low status/being looked down upon, being forced to interact with people you don’t like or trust, not having access to nature, etc., it would be likely to increase happiness.  Today in America, money’s effect tends to top out at about $50,000/year, and after that its returns drop.  As a dramatic demonstration of this, in a study of 22 people who won major lotteries, researchers found that after some time these people were no happier than matched controls who hadn’t won. (Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Is Happiness Relative?)  (It also seems to be the case that earned money correlates with happiness far more than won money. (Can Money But Happiness? By Arthur C. Brooks) (9)  Money spent on acquiring things often doesn’t increase happiness, because trying to buy happiness puts you on what has been labeled the ”hedonic treadmill.”  The pattern is that a new possession will give you a temporary boost, but then you will fall back to your previous level, and you then need to buy something else to get another boost.  Since the tendency is to have to up the ante each time, it’s a race you can’t win.  From reading this post, you might reasonably conclude that it does make a lot of sense for someone to say, “I’ll be happier when I have an income of at least $50,000/year, a job I love, good friends, access to nature, etc.  But all too often what people are saying is something like, “I’ll be happy when I get that big raise or promotion.”  To fight this money trap one piece of advice is, instead of comparing yourself to others who have more than you, use downward comparisons.  Read stories about people going through catastrophes. (Recommended happiness reading – Memoirs of illness and catastropheThe Happiness Project)  Compare yourself with those who have less than you, who have gone through tragedy, and who are struggling.  Make a list of all the positive things in your life: friends, family, a job you love, good health, enough food, etc.  You might come to see that you are blessed.  And if your circumstances are very bad, stories where someone overcame incredible hardships inspire you to believe you can also.  It’s OK to have material goals, but you shouldn’t fall into the trap of thinking you’ll be happy when you reach some high material accomplishment. 

The same principle also applies to very high status.  Try to focus on that you have accomplished, not on what you haven’t.  It is certainly true that having high status helps happiness, but it too has diminishing returns.  And if your self-esteem comes out of a title, then losing your job is a catastrophe.  This explains why the loss of a job is very bad for happiness, since people lose self-respect and expect to be seen as a failure by family and friends. You need to remember that your job isn’t you, and avoid the status trap.  So don’t envy others’ great wealth or status, if you do you’re probably living an unbalanced life and targeting the wrong goals. (10) A good strategy to achieve maximal happiness is to invest your energy in a balanced way in most, if not all, of the various factors that contribute to happiness.  Once a category is above a certain level, you’re probably misallocating resources if you are trying to drive it to the sky.  Keep your priorities balanced, and practice moderation in most things.  Indulge yourself occasionally, but don’t make indulgence into part of your lifestyle.  Obviously, addictions and compulsions can ruin lives. 

The advice in this post is geared for those people who have enough to offer such that they can fit into some sort of reasonable community.  In short, you aren’t that toxic person everyone else is rejecting.  Living in a community requires a degree of honesty, and, like most things in life, honesty involves tradeoffs.  There are clear benefits to deception; otherwise our capability for it would never have evolved.  There are many circumstances such as war or negotiation, where unvarnished honesty would drive you from the field of battle.  Likewise, individuals with little to offer often end up in the unenviable situation of having problems they can’t ignore, and they can’t solve in any honest way.  While the compromises such people fashion might entail large costs, they also might be the best they can do given their limited resources and capabilities.  In addition to habitual dishonesty, a whole panoply of dysfunctional behavior patterns (drinking, engaging with prostitutes, habitual pornography, gambling, etc.) sometimes can be viewed as coping mechanisms used by those who have no better options.  If you aren’t in such an unfortunate situation, fitting into a community as a respected member can be the path to a happier life.  We need a place called home.  A community of people is a group who care about each other (which lowers the stress response), participate together in meaningful activities, who believe in the system, and are mutually invested in a common set of rules.  The nature of community makes it an ongoing enterprise.  Cooperation is fostered by shared fate, and the expectation that people will interact into the future.  In this way reciprocity and equality are encouraged, and cheaters are punished and driven out.  People often have common interests, a common background, propinquity, and support each others’ dreams & goals.  So, you should use the power of others to help achieve your goals, and listen to good advice from trustworthy friends.  (The Evolution of Despair by Robert Wright – Lost Wanderer, The Importance of Belonging and Community – Lost Wanderer, and The Uplift Program for Happiness - Lost Wanderer)  Having said all this, if you are so dysfunctional that you are toxic, you should look to other sources for happiness advice. (The Origins of Violence: Is Psychopathy an Adaptation? by Ian Pitchford

Good relationships are a very important determinant of happiness for almost everyone.  (Rejection Creates Resentment – Lost Wanderer)  One of the many reasons for this is people need motivated conversation.  We must feel needed.  Research indicates that it’s more important to worry about having around five good friends rather than a lot of them.  Extraverted people are happier, and if your social circle is lacking you should try to meet some new people.  (Succeed Socially.comGood family relations and a significant-other long-term loving relationship help a lot.  Married people are happier than the unmarried, and widowhood is bad for happiness.  (Although it isn’t clear what impact having children has on happiness.) (A Simple Statistical Method for Measuring how Life Events Affect Happiness, The Math of Love – Lost Wanderer, and For those who are Contemplating Marriage – Lost Wanderer) (11) 

But, this raises an obvious question, “Just what is a good relationship?”  In order to have good relationships we have to do our part.  To have good friends we have to be one.  One starting point is to remember that people don’t remember what you said so much as they remember how you made them feel.  The advice people give on the topic of friendship is commonsensical: 

  • Be polite, be fair and follow the rules. (12)
  • Don’t maliciously lie (lying to protect someone is more of a judgment call). 
  • Keep your wordpay your debts, take what’s yours, and be patient and flexible. 
  • Don’t react in anger.  (If you’re angry count to 10, and wait 24 hours before sending an angry email) 
  • Try to not hold grudges, and follow the golden rule. (13) 
  • Practice compassion by putting yourself in their shoes. (14) 
  • A good relationship will have: trust, respect, appreciation, and enthusiasm.  It will be transparent and have open communication with people able to, for the most part, freely express their needs and feelings while empathizing with one another.  (15)  You will be involved, accessible, engaged, reliable, and committed.  (A New Scale to Assess the Therapeutic Relationship in a Community Mental Health Care: STAR
  • Of course, it’s a two way street, and you should try to hang around with people who also do and are these thingsHappiness is a team sport.  In the end we should try to interact with people we like and who like us back, and be with the people we can count on when the chips are on the line.  (16)  (See also, Fighting Fair in Relationships - Lost Wanderer
  • Take responsibility for what you do. 
  • Happy people are emotionally stable and socially competent.
  • You should try to live your values, and know your moral bottom line
  • Keep it real.  Can you take what you say seriously? (17) (18)    

Stephen Pinker, in “How the Mind Works“, discusses two mechanisms that can contribute to creating strong friendships.  First, if people share a rare common interest they will often naturally generate positive externalities for each other.  For example, if two people both like an esoteric genre of music they can share advice about it, and they become more valuable to each other.  If two people are more valuable to each other this results in a positive feedback cycle, because each can more likely count on the other for aid.  Because each is not only a source of advice, but also aid, they see each other as still more valuable.  This process iterates in an upward spiral.  Second, in similar fashion, if John has a special area of expertise that Susan values, and can’t easily substitute for, then he becomes valuable to her.  He will know that he is valuable to her, which means that he knows he can more likely count on her for aid and support.  So as a result she now becomes more valuable to him.  She now knows that he thinks she is valuable to him, so she can now count on him for more support.  Again, the same upward spiral occurs.  These two mechanisms highlight the importance competency has.  Happy people are more competent people.  The more competent you are in general the more you have to offer.  Having more to offer, you will attract others who will also have more to offer.  So you should find the things you’re are good at and love to do, and develop these areas.  One strategy is to ask yourself, “What’s in short supply?”  Then try to make yourself an indispensible expert, and find those who will value most what you have to offer.  (The Evolution of Happiness by David M. Buss)  The idea is not that you are helping people in a bean counting tit-for-tat way, but if you can help generally, by being able to give to people what they can’t get from others, you can build friendships. (19)  Happy people want the best for those around them, they like other people, and help people when they can for their own sakes.  Help people problem solve, share their goals, help them find a silver lining, and be on their side/team. (20) (21)  All of this will create confidence in everyone involved.  Besides sounding nice, it turns out that it’s also in our own self-interest to increase the happiness of those around us, because people catch emotions from others.  Happiness spreads in society in waves, much like a viral infection, and your happiness somewhat depends on the happiness of people who are 3 degrees of separation from you.  (Happiness is Contagious – Lost Wanderer)   So try to do one thing every day to make someone else happy.  In marriage if one partner is happy the other also on average will be happier. 

We are a social species, as evidenced by the large number of social emotions we have for regulating our interactions with others: guilt, shame, self-righteousness, loneliness, jealously, love, modesty, resentment, contempt, gratitude, approval, pity, etc.  Humans evolved in small hunter gatherer groups of 50 to 200 individuals, and most of these were kin.  So continuous face time is the default setting, and it was the norm for 99% of human evolution.  In the hunter-gatherer days being in a tribe in which you trusted the collective decision making of the group would have been important for survival.  Because it would have entailed such a high a fitness cost, incompetent leadership became something that made people unhappy.  How would you have felt if you thought your tribal leaders were criminals, incompetent, or malicious; instead of honest, honorable, and competent? (22)  It only makes sense that this would be one of the determinates of happiness today, only now it’s good government that plays the role of the tribal council.  The happiest countries are small, stable, homogenous, democratic, protect human rights and liberty, they are efficiently run, and have honest courts.  People have trust and confidence in their government.  I don’t think I’m speculating too wildly when I suggest that if a country is stable this means you don’t have to deal with the anxiety that arises out of political turmoil.  A homogenous country generates less suspicion that various other factional interests are trying to take advantage of you (9), and you will be more likely to have a sense of belonging. (Trust in Communities and Ethnic Diversity – Lost Wanderer and Belonging versus Support – Lost Wanderer) (23)  If a country is democratic you have status as an equal citizen, and democracies imply the various rights and freedoms that allow you to tailor your life to achieve greater happiness.  An efficiently run country implies a good standard of living, and honest courts means that you can trust you won’t be legally cheated.  Northern European countries are the happiest: Denmark, the Netherlands, and the Scandinavian countries.  Other countries with high levels of happiness are Switzerland, Canada, and Costa Rica. (24) 

Spirituality is another aspect of human experience that’s important for happiness.  Spirituality exists when a person has an emotional connection to something larger than themselves.  This can be many things: their community or country, a cause, science, God, etc.  People have suggested that for an activity to be meaningful in the spiritual sense we must understand what it is and how to do it, and how it fits into the larger picture creating a benefit for that larger thing that is beyond ourselves.  Whatever the specific object of a person’s spirituality, it is characterized by four major affective components: a sense of gratitude (appreciation of benefits received), awe (an overwhelming feeling of deep respect, wonder, and fear), transcendence (a state of being or existence above and beyond the limits of material experience; lying beyond the ordinary range of perception, preeminent or supreme), and love.  Spirituality gives people a sense that they are needed, a belief/feeling that they have a higher purpose.  They believe they are living by a higher narrative.  Some defenders of the spirituality argue that if you think that it’s irrational to be spiritual, you should dare to be irrational, because you already are in so many ways.  Not infrequently spirituality involves religious beliefs about judgment and an afterlife, and this provides another reason why it creates happiness, because it helps happiness to believe in ultimate justice.  (Although a religion full of hate tends to drive out happiness.)  Durkheim argued that God ultimately refers in a metaphorical way to the clan or tribe.  (The Death of Animism, Community, and God – Lost Wanderer, Alienation and Animism – Lost Wanderer, and “Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought” by Pascal Boyer – Lost Wanderer)  If this is so, then the purest form of spirituality would exist in relationship to a community, and the other forms (to science, a cause, etc.) would be in some sense substitutes. (25) (26) 

The old clich’e, “Do what you love and you’ll never work a day in your life.” leads directly to the important idea that if you can do what you love to do, and you are good at, you will live a much happier life.  (How to Find Your Passion – Stepcase Lifehack, Find and Follow Your Bliss, The Short but Powerful Guide to Finding Your Passion - Zen Habits)  When deciding which job to take, along with salary and benefits, the questions should be: how engaging and meaningful will this work be for you?   The opposite of work you love is toxic work, which is work that mentally exhausts you. (27)  Whenever I have heard a world champion, or anyone who is at the top of their field, interviewed, and the interviewer asks, “What is the secret of your success?” almost inevitably the first thing the person says is, “I love what I do.”  They are passionate about it, and when going to bed generally look forward to, or even can’t wait for, the next day.  They are mentally energized and thrilled by it.  For them work can even be joyful and gleeful.  I think this partly explains what Joseph Campbell meant when he said, “I don’t believe people are looking for the meaning of life as much as they are looking for the experience of being alive.”  Work is for them is what play is to a child.  Most people can think back to some period of their lives, frequently when they were children, when they woke up every day passionate about living.  If you love your work much of your life will be like this.  Csikszentmihalyi says that such work creates the experience of “Flow.” (28)  People are not focused on themselves, but absorbed and fascinated.  One acquaintance of mine once said that his father was a big strong guy, loved helping people, loved fire, and loved working in groups.  So he became – what else? - a fireman.  Other examples I’ve run across include: The Olympic gold medal winning wrestler Cael Sanderson, who had to work to not smile during matches, because he enjoyed them so much. Warren Buffett describes himself as “tap dancing to work every day.” And the mathematician David Hilbert, who while delivering a funeral eulogy lost track of the situation and started enthusiastically delivering a math lecture! (29) Even those of us can’t do something we love for a living should make a list of those things we love to do, and try to make time for them every day. (30) (31) (See also Mindset: The New Psychology of Success by Carol Dweck- Lost Wanderer

Our sense of ourselves, or how our thoughts and words relate to external reality, has real consequences.  So there are a number of habits you can cultivate that involve deliberately managing your thoughts and emotions to increase happiness:  Our attitudes somewhat determine who we are, which leads directly to the old idea of having a positive attitude.  A positive frame of reference flows out of what you pay attention to, how you interpret it, and how you remember it.  You might begin by keeping a journal each day, and fill it with entries that reflect on what went well in the last 24 hours.  When someone is negative you should try to think of two positives for each negative.  In general look for the silver lining, for beauty – which is always there in the world, and try to find some meaning in even the worst of things.  Spin it half full rather than half empty, and ask, “What did I learn, and what is better because of it?”  Make lemonade out of lemons by asking, ”How can I take advantage of this development?”   Think about how it could have been worse, and could always be worse.  If you don’t have any information at all (even probabilistic) guess positive until proven otherwise.  Expect happiness. 

However, while hope and optimism are essential for happiness, you should never confuse the general belief that you will overcome in the end with the expectation of success of any specific plans you have made.  You need to be confident, but not have unrealistic expectations.  In other words, believe in yourself, but not too much.  You should expect disappointment within an overall joyful life.  You need to also be realistic enough so your rose colored glasses don’t become blinders such that you only see the positive, and ignore some impending catastrophe.  So when making specific plans you might try imagining the worst case outcome, then imagine the best, and then imagine something in between.  The third one will generally be much more likely. 

Other habits of mind you need to be aware of include: If you worry a lot, give yourself a set time and place each day to worry, and then otherwise don’t.  Self-monitor and keep a score in a worry journal where you write them all down.  Don’t indulge pointless negative thoughts, but note them in your worry journal and then change the topic. You will probably find that most of the things you worry about either never come true, or they come true in a way no one could have anticipated or prevented.  Stress and tension are universal negatives, so the more you can eliminate them the better. (32)  Sometimes it is best to simply face our fears.  For example, you might think about, share, talk about, and deal with your fears of death, instead of letting them hang over you.  In general it turns out that the best way of dealing with negative thoughts isn’t to try to suppress them, or to vent them, but instead to change the subject and think about positive and productive things, such as, for example, what you are grateful for.  Being generally grateful is very important for happiness.  One technique people have suggested is to construct a “gratitude bomb” by making a detailed list of all the things other people have done for you over the course of your life.  It should run into thousands of items, and could be overwhelming.  Cultivate gratitude, make it into a habit, and incorporate it into your routine.  In this way you are recreating the experience of being in a tribe.  Along with gratitude, forgiveness has been called, “an essential ingredient for mental health,” (33) because anger and hate drive out love.  Try to think about your own faults before you beat up on others for theirs.

Still more advice includes: 

  • You might need to try to be more decisive.  When faced with an uncertain choice, make it and move on.  In studies where people were allowed to reconsider and change their choices they were on average less happy with them. 
  • Don’t dwell on what you can’t control, but focus on the positive things you can do to make things better. (34)  Don’t ignore what bothers you if you can change it.  Your aim should be to fix the problem, or at least make it better.  If you can’t do either, your last option is to try to focus on something else you can do something about.  You can’t control the past, so give yourself a break, don’t beat yourself up for mistakes, flush the guilt, don’t brood, learn from your errors, and move on and improve. 
  • You don’t have to be perfect.  You should strive to appreciate your strengths, root for yourself, give yourself credit for what you have to offer, accept your shortcomings and weaknesses, and thereby cultivate self-acceptance. (35)  Try daily self-affirmations.  Make a list of your positive characteristics.  Put them on index cards, hide them around your house, and every time you see one focus on it for a while.  Treat yourself the way you would treat a good friend, and in this way work on your self-esteem. 
  • Don’t set yourself up to fail by setting goals that are incompatible.  Don’t persist in clearly unwinnable conflicts, but recognize the situation and tactically retreat. (You’ve Gotta Know When to Fold ‘Em: Goal Disengagement and Systemic Inflammation in AdolescenceSet reasonable goals, both short term and long term, you can have success with in all areas of your life.  (See also Mystery Moods – Lost Wanderer)  The idea is to create a record of success, so that you can develop self-confidence in your abilities.  Happy people feel successful, and are satisfied with their lives. 
  • Practice being honest with yourself.  Don’t self-handicap in order to have an excuse ready if you don’t succeed. 
  • You might also have to learn to not care what certain people think of you (8 Best Ways to Deal with Detractors – Zen Habits); and, as harsh as it sounds, to flush toxic people at some point. (36) 
  • Work at failing fast and cheap.  That is, figure out if you can succeed at whatever you’re doing early on in the process, and if you can’t drop it. 
  • Try to see the humor and play in life. (37)  Look for books, films, and TV shows on DVD that you find funny. 
  • Remember that you always have choices, so you have some control, and aren’t helpless. 
  • You need to be open to new ideas, and try to learn something new every day.  Challenge and novelty are important elements of happiness.   
  • Being able to negotiate well is a general applicable and valuable skill. (38)  
  • You might need to learn to be appropriately assertive, to stand your ground, and speak up for yourself. (39) 
  • You might consider learning to play poker well.  Bill Gates, among many others, credits poker with teaching him a lot about how to run a business. (pp. 396-7, “Cowboys Full: The Story of Poker” by James McManus
  • Develop your problem solving skills. (40) 
  • More education can sometimes help, and a conscientious attitude (the tendency to be organized, and to think carefully and thoroughly before acting) is often a plus. 
  • You have to learn to take reasonable risks, so you can’t be too afraid of failure.  If you’re not occasionally failing you’re not taking enough chances.  It turns out that moderate, rational risk takers, who are from the 50th percentile to the 84th, are the happiest. (The Art of Living Dangerously by William Gurstelle)  “Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that something else is more important than fear.” (Ambrose Redmoon).  So don’t feed the fear, feed the dream.  Think of solutions, instead of dwelling on worst case scenarios.
  • Things are rarely as good or as bad as they seem, so try to take a 3rd party perspective, and be somewhat detached and analytical when things go wrong.  This doesn’t mean you’re uninvolved, but instead it’s more likely your problem solving will be more productive. (Calm as a Monk: How Equanimity Can Save Your Sanity – Zen Habits
  • When you have to do unpleasant things do the worst things first, get them out of the way instead of having them hang over you head. 
  • People who plan for the future and delay gratification often come out ahead in the long run.  So, don’t take shortcuts that will hurt you in the long run. 
  • But, you also don’t want to end up only living in the future (or the past) but try to live in the present and enjoy it.  The past is to learn from, the present is to enjoy, and the future is to look forward to.  The goal is to keep them balanced and in their proper places. 
  • Try laughter yoga. 
  • If you have gone through emotional trauma try expressive writing for getting over it. Write down in detail what happened and your feelings about it.  Get it out of your head, and know your own mind.  See your flawed thoughts, be honest with yourself.  To remember it practice telling someone else. 
  • The book, “Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness” argues that we should arrange our lives so that it’s easy to do the right things.  The authors argue that we have self-control problems because of limited time and the various mental shortcut heuristics we use to get along in the world.  (List of Cognitive Biases - Wikipedia)  So we should tilt the playing field in our favor by, for example, intentionally setting our default options. 
  • Control your desires. 
  • The simplicity movement argues that many people have their priorities confused, and we should simplify our lives and flush the clutter.  (Simple Living, Simple Living – Wikipedia)
  • You might try recording your night-time dreams and sharing them with others.  Some people report this can lead to lucid dreaming. (The Lucidity Institute
  • Some people find getting a pet helpful. (Happiness Is: Are Pet Owners Happier?
  • Create new challenges by starting a new hobby, joining an organization, or learning a new skill.  A general rule is to buy experiences rather than goods, because a good experience will tend to get better each time you remember it.  (”59 Seconds: Think a Little, Change a Lot“ and Richard Wiseman’s Online Webpage for his book “59 Seconds...) So go to a concert, movie, unusual place, or strange restaurant.  
  • One piece of happiness advice is to smile more often.  While it’s true that our emotional state helps determine whether we smile, it turns out that the lines of causation are a two way street, and if we smile we can actually make ourselves happier.  People are told to practice by putting a pencil between their teeth.  (“Just smile, you’ll feel better!” Will you? Really?
  • On her blog, The Happiness Project, Gretchen Rubin lists many suggested readings, and says that she found the 13 virtues of Franklin (41), The Rambler, The Life of Samuel Johnson, and St. Therese, Story of a Soul especially helpful to her. 
  • Fight procrastination. (42) 
  • It was John Wooden who said, “Don’t let what you cannot do interfere with what you can do.” 
  • Commit when appropriate, don’t hold back, and ignore the irrational messages/feelings that interfere with success
  • Finish the projects you start that are worth finishing.  If you have a winning hand, be stubborn and keep at it. 
  • Work at being lucky. (How to Be Lucky – Lost Wanderer
  • Compromise is sometimes wise, satisficers tend to be happier than maximizers, and the perfect can be the enemy of the good. 
  • Don’t be a slave to rules, but be flexible in means to a given end. (Predictors of Success for People with Learning Disabilities – Lost Wanderer
  • You have to learn to take constructive criticism.  Being in touch with reality is often painful, but (if you are willing to take the pain) you have to let the evidence guide you even if it hurts.  For many people, it is so painful to consider ideas/arguments they disagree with, or are outside their current world view, they shut them out. (43)
  • Wives are happier if they believe their husband is committed to the relationship
  • Vacations shouldn’t be thought of as a set of experiences, but as a celebration of family.
  • In general, it’s bad to be alone or watching a lot of TV.  It’s better to be listening to music or reading
  • Look for ways to be romantic. (Cheap but great dates – Zen Habits)  
  • Happy people aren’t too emotionally dependent on other’s approval.  Of course, it’s a balancing act between our need for others and our need to have a sense of control, independence, autonomy, and self-support. 
  • Happy people don’t experience many of the negative emotions that erode happiness: they have low tensions, stress, fear, guilt, resentments, regrets and worries.  Happy people like themselves.  People with high self-confidence see themselves as having many good qualities, positive traits and abilities.  They see themselves as likeable, attractive, and worthwhile. 
  • Many of the roots of the positive school of psychology stem from the humanistic school. (Positive psychology – Wikipedia and Humanistic psychology – Wikipedia)  Psychologists such Maslow focused on such topics as love, creativity, self-actualization or “fulfilling one’s highest potential”.  (FWIW, I’m not actually sure what they mean by ”self-actualization.”) 
  • Happiness is itself a resource that produces better relationships, longer life, health, wound healing, a lower chance of suicide, less depression, and less alcohol and drug abuse.    
  • Stop looking at virtually all mass media, and get rid of the TV.  Advertising is selling the myth that buying things will make us happier.  We are continually being invited to be seduced by the unhealthy cheap thrills of modern life.  (Superstimuli – Whole Health Source)  Because of the mass media we all now compete with the best in the world, and compare our lives with the fantasy ones we see on TV.  Beautiful people are constantly paraded across the screen, providing unhealthy upward comparisons.  We could be the best at something in the ancient tribe, but now envy, which used to motivate people within realistic settings, leads to depression, self-perceived failure, and frustration.  If an athlete wins a silver medal at the Olympics announcers will describe the second best in the world (by a hair) as having “lost.”  On top of all this, the news presents us with a depressing negatively distorted version of reality (see foot note 22).

(1) Any statement like this is always limited to the range of variation of the relevant variables that was present in the environments where the studies were done.  If some very important variables were highly range restricted then a statistic won’t generalize to another environment where these variable weren’t so restricted.  For example, if everyone in a population was deficient in a symbiotic bacterium that strongly affects happiness by changing serotonin levels, then the researcher’s statistical model predicting happiness would be incomplete, and its heritability estimate for other environments would be different.

(2) Having said this, while people do vary in what makes them happy, there’s also a fair degree of agreement among people about this, otherwise giving advice would be impossible beyond saying, “Follow your own heart.” 

(3) Since our hunter gatherer ancestors hardly owned anything, and they were generally happy, it makes a lot of sense that owning things wouldn’t create happiness for us either.  A caveat to this is that today a minimal level of possessions are often necessary as a signal of status, and status has always been correlated with happiness, both in the hunter gatherer time and today.

(4) The simple pleasures simply have to be enough to create happy lives.  Hunter-gatherers didn’t have trips to Europe, etc., yet they were happy with only their spears and skins.  We know they were happy both from anthropologists’ reports, and from the fact that evolutionary selection wouldn’t have fashioned an animal that was generally unhappy in its natural environment.  The fitness cost from the stress would have simply been too large.

(5) Unless the person is psychotic, I would think that at some point a person’s perception of their health would correlate with their actual health.  So, their actual health must also matter. 

(6) The lowest status in a community is to be socially rejected and shunned by everyone in that community.  For an exploration of what happens when you are on the very bottom of a society, see (Delusions as Strategic Deception – Lost Wanderer).  Being cast-out might be considered an even lower case, but then you are no longer inside the community.

(7) To help our sleeping Ilardi recommends we turn off the lights 1 hour before bedtime, and use only a soft lamp or candlelight with no overhead or computers.

(8) This last piece of advice stems from the fact that sunlight is about 100 times as bright as artificial light, and through specialized receptors in the back of our eyes it adjusts our body clocks, which regulate our sleep and hormones.  We also get vitamin D this way, and most people in modern society are deficient in this.  (Vitamin D Deficiency in Modern Society – Lost Wanderer)

(9) This distinction might help explain why affirmative action is so controversial.  Besides all the other objections (Affirmative Action: A Worldwide Disaster by Thomas Sowell), instead of redistributing only money, it is also attempting to redistribute status.  As such, it rearranges the social hierarchy, and more clearly attempts to redistribute happiness.

(10) You want to manage your relationship with money, and not let it manage you.  You should try to eliminate debt, and build an emergency fund (a major way to reduce stress and make you feel more secure).  If you can find less expensive ways to do things, control impulse spending, and learn to live with less you will likely be happier in the long run.  A good book to start thinking about this is, “Your Money or Your Life: 9 Steps to Transforming Your Relationship with Money and Achieving Financial Independence: Revised and Updated for the 21st Century.” by Vicki Robin et al.

(11) The general advice seems to be: Select a mate who is similar to you in mate-value & values, interests, politics, and personality.  A spouse should also be agreeable, emotionally stable, conscientious, and open to new experiences.

(12) The advice for good relationships overlaps with the advice for good sportsmanship, e.g., be polite and use appropriate language, don’t show off, respect your opponents, don’t argue with officials, don’t make up excuses when you lose – instead learn from it, cheer the other guy, don’t cheat, the team often comes first, etc.  Also, don’t engage in gamesmanship. (Gamesmanship – Wikipedia)

(13) Although, if you are ending a relationship, I could imagine circumstances where revenge could be an attractive option as a healing experience. 

(14) One exercise is to start by imagining the suffering of a loved one.  Try to see the world as they see it, so that you can understand their pain, their emotions, and why they would react the way they do.  By repeating this exercise, you are developing a skill that can be applied to everyone, so that you can better understand what they are going through.   

(15) In relationships you should practice active listening, which means that you: pay attention and respond, really try to understand the other person, make eye contact, don’t judge them, use touch, recognize their emotions and non-verbal cues. (For more, see The Art of Active Listening Tip Sheet and Active Listening Skills

(16) David Buss even recommends that we set up critical tests to see who we can really depend on, and thereby develop a greater sense of deep social connections. (The Evolution of Happiness by David M. Buss)   

(17) What makes for bad relationships is also common sense: People are angry, neurotically needy, condescending, destructively critical, reject and dislike one another.  They find each other annoying.  They are impatient, dishonest, and authoritarian.  They use pressure, engage in one-upmanship, and play manipulative games.  Other common practices include: not taking responsibility, changing the topic when they don’t want to talk about it, lying, playing dumb, withholding information, playing victim, feeling entitled, verbally minimizing the harm they’ve done, and basically not caring about others.  One test of whether or not a relationship is toxic for you is to ask yourself if you feel more energized or less after spending time with that person.  (Thinking Errors List and 15 Common Thinking Errors)

(18) The problem with this advice is that it is in some tension with the advice to be positive.  Imagine that you are, in fact, ugly (or even deformed), have a very low IQ, are a terrible athlete, naturally socially awkward, you can find nothing you enjoy in life, you are in bad health, in extreme poverty, everyone but mental cases and criminals reject you, and the only women interested in you are prostitutes.  Wouldn’t it be rational to be depressed?  Wouldn’t it be rational to see yourself in unflattering terms, because it’s true?  In short, the bottom 1% will be, of course by definition, in the bottom 1%.  Someone must be on the bottom of any competitive distribution, including a distribution of those things in life that make for happiness.  This highlights another of the tragedies of life, since good things tend to co-vary in populations (because of assortative mating, if nothing else), some people will end up on the bottom along many dimensions.  Their lives are the tragic and inevitable outcome of the logic of a competitive Malthusian type of world. (Malthusian catastrophe - Wikipedia and The Most IMPORTANT Video You’ll Ever See by Dr. Albert A. Bartlett)  Low self-confidence correlates with unhappiness, and people with low self-confidence see themselves as unattractive and as failures, feel inadequate and guilty, expect to be socially rejected, are shy, self-conscious, self-critical, and hyper-sensitive.  They doubt love, are jealous and possessive, are unsuccessful and dissatisfied with their inter-personal relationships, have difficulty accepting praise, and are cautions and fearful.  Those who are unhappy are more neurotic, have many unfulfilled aspirations, are anxious, rigid, and display low spontaneity.  They are dependent on others for their self-esteem, are over concerned with prestige and social approval, have dissatisfying family lives, and are self-abasing.  They feel inadequate and insecure, are pessimistic and suspicious, are more likely to have experienced a loss of love, are socially withdrawn, and worry excessively. They are less competent, are less organized, and have lower mastery of the skills necessary to achieve their goals.  All this can easily end in self-hatred.  Those on the bottom will be more likely to be only able to socialize with others on the bottom, and the reason these other people are on the bottom is that they too don’t have much to offer.  In such circumstances, when you are hanging around with others who are depressed, and you can’t trust and don’t like, it would be rational to be depressed yourself.  This perspective is partially supported by the phenomenon of depressive realism.  This is where people with depression have been found to have a more accurate perception of reality.  Although the picture is complicated, people who are happier tend to have illusions of superiority, control, and excessive optimism.  (Depressive Realism – Wikipedia)

(19) This distinction is important and can be perhaps clarified by recalling the song, I Hate Myself for Loving You.  The idea this song captures is that someone might know that at a calculating rational level it would be far better to not love someone.  But at a more primal level they simply do.  If a person were extraordinarily lucky none of their desires would ever be in conflict.  In terms of relationships it’s ideal if you both like helping someone, and it is also in your long-term rational self-interest to do so.  The problem is that if you help people, but don’t really like them, there is the risk they will sense the calculating nature of your help, and discount accordingly.  Of course, you also get far less out of this sort of relationship.  But, this raises an obvious objection:  I can choose to act in a certain way out of calculated self-interest.  But, I can’t choose to like/love someone.  So what do I do if I don’t?  The two pieces of advice that come to mind are to fake it until you hopefully do feel it.  And to set up the background conditions that will make such feeling likely to eventually occur, and hope that they do.   

(20) A person I know who went to an African country on business said that everyone there was desperately poor.  So everyone was constantly cheating everyone else every time they could to try to simply survive the day.  Of course, this created a downward spiral that no one could ever get out of, so they were all desperately poor.  This next story might be apocryphal, but perhaps will serve as a useful allegory:  I read that if you put one lobster in an aquarium it will often be able to crawl out.  But if you put two lobsters in the same sort of aquarium neither will ever get out, because as soon as one starts crawling up the other will instinctively come over and crawl up on it, pulling the first one back down.  So, if you want to get out of whatever trap you’re all in, find people you can trust, get behind them when they are trying to crawl out, and push.   

(21)  When giving advice it is usually best to suggest possibilities, but not to give instructions.  You should prioritize, and focus precisely on the most important points.  Also, avoid giving mixed messages, e.g., “It was fine, but you could improve it.”  And avoid making vague statements, e.g., “I don’t like it.” 

(22) I share the opinion of many of the most informed people I know that America as a corrupt society going to Hell.  The media, if not telling outright lies, through agenda setting, framing, the use of redefinition, and the careful taxonomic use of language categories supports an elite that rules by deception.  All this, along with a corrupt court system, both encourages and disguises the ongoing destruction of this society.  Those who speak out are pariahs, and considered either insane, fools, or far worse.  Those who are the relatively honest people in power all too often must, at the least, compromise their principles to stay there.  Morality is inverted, with honorable people called scum by dishonorable people who are in positions of power.  Our presidents tend to be of one of two types, either they don’t know the truth, or they are semi-psychopathic liars.  Seemingly, anyone who knows the truth, and tells it, has a very hard time get elected.  Think about two of our recent presidents: Clinton was credibly accused of rape, and Bush is a smirking fool who pushed for a war that killed hundreds of thousands, and will cost an estimated 3 trillion dollars.  Yet, both of them are now comfortably retired.  The worst part of this is that the ultimate source of the problem is the American people.  The population of this country can’t handle the truth, and instead prefers to be told comforting lies.  So, as we spiral down towards Hell, this the system can’t reform itself and, barring some miracle, this nation is doomed.  (As you might guess my perspective hasn’t done much for my happiness.) 

(23) In his book, Love and Survival, Dean Ornish also makes the point that in order to feel emotionally secure you need to have some sort of reasonably standardized rules.  You have the option of any number of different choices, but you should have some standard, so that you know when you are right with the tribe.  (Love and Survival by Dean Ornish – Lost Wanderer)

(24) Having said this, while it is much better to live in a country with good government than bad, I doubt that even the best modern state does as well as the tribal council often did.  If things were going well people once had the whole tribe for social support, with typically each person a valued member of an enduring social group.  As such they lived their whole lives enmeshed in a web of deep intimate contacts within an extended kin group.  Today, we have lost this social support network, and are often limited to the nuclear family.  In the Paleolithic your kin determined what the law was, now the law is complex and created by strangers.  And at work people often suffer a sense of powerlessness as worker bees in large companies.  In short, even in the best societies, today we live relatively socially isolated disempowered lives. (The Evolution of Despair by Robert Wright – Lost Wanderer)

(25) Along the lines of thinking about spirituality as a phenomenon that grows out of community, evolutionary psychologist David Sloan Wilson argues that religion evolved to allow groups to better cooperate, and that those groups that had religion out competed those that didn’t. (Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society by David Sloan Wilson)

(26) Jonathan Ellerby lists the various paths by which people have traditionally tried to achieve spiritual enlightenment through following specific practices.  These include: ceremony and ritual, sacred movement, sound and music, prayer, meditation, study, yoga, death practice, sacred service, and ascetic practice.  (Return to The Sacred: Ancient Pathways to Spiritual Awakening by Jonathan H. Ellerby)

(27) When you are mentally tired one of the best ways to recharge yourself is not to rest or sleep, but engage in something you find fascinating.  For example, you might read a great heart-pounding page-turner of a mystery story. 

(28) Being engaged in flow also prevents your brooding on negative thoughts.  When you brood your stress level goes up, driving your depression level up.  Brooding does have some initial benefit, because it allows us to think through why something went wrong and not make that mistake again.  But it has diminishing returns, and after the first hour or so past the first day of brooding you generally aren’t helping matters.  After that it is usually best to try to focus on something else, with several of the more engaging activities for most people being conversation and learning new interesting things.  If activities are intrinsically enjoyable people’s attention won’t be wandering.  They will not have to work to pay attention, they will be present, observing, and be breathing differently.  (Practical Tips to Practice Being Present)

(29) “David Hilbert was one of the great European mathematicians at the turn of the century. One of his students purchased an early automobile, and died in one of the first car accidents. Hilbert was asked to speak at the funeral. “Young Klaus,” he said, “was one of my finest students. He had an unusual gift for doing mathematics. He was interested in a great variety of problems, such as…” There was a short pause, followed by, “Consider the set of differentiable functions on the unit interval and take their closure in the …”" (Exactly Who and What is Your Instructor?)

(30) Jim Collins, the author of such books as, Good to Great, gives this career advice:  There is the set of all the things you are good at.  There is the set of all the things you love to do.  And there is the set of all the things you can make a living at.  Assuming these three sets intersect, pick from the intersect your choice of careers.  

(31) Csikszentmihalyi has argued that one common characteristic a flow type activity must have is that there must be an appropriate level of challenge in the activity.  Beyond this, it seems that much of what makes something into an experience of flow for a person depends on the particulars of the individual.  The most enjoyable for most people are unfortunately very hard to turn into jobs: sex with a loving partner, socializing with friends, relaxing, meditating or praying, eating, and sports.  Of course, these are all activities that we evolved to enjoy back in the hunter-gatherer days when hunting and gathering were our jobs.  One way evolution gets an animal to do what it needs to do to survive is to make those things enjoyable.  Unfortunately the rise of civilization created a mismatch between those things we instinctively like to do, and what we have to do to get along in today’s world.  So an animal that was designed to go out and pack-hunt down a large dangerous animal for dinner, in a kind of thrilling sporting event, might now be working turning bolts 8 hours a day on an assembly line.  No wonder comparatively few people say, “I passionately love what I do.”  The least enjoyable activities are things like commuting, working, and doing housework.  I once thought of this party-proof that no job is fun: Suppose an employer has a job which is actually fun for most people, and he is paying someone $20/hour to do it.  As soon as word gets out someone will show up at his door and say, “I will do it for $19/hour.”  The next day it will be $18, and so on, until people are paying the employer to do the job.  So any job that does pay anything at all can’t be that job.  So, no job is fun.  This ”proof” of course isn’t correct, because there can be barriers to entry, specialized abilities necessary to do the job, and someone might have unique tastes and preferences - enjoying a job few other people would, etc.  But what it does indicate is, all other things being equal, the more enjoyable a job is the less it will pay.  (See also Before the Fall, Evidence for a Golden Age by Steve Taylor – Lost Wanderer, The Worst Mistake In The History Of The Human Race by Jared Diamond – Lost Wanderer)

(32) I once had an instructor make the point that people wouldn’t want total certainty, because that would be boring.  (A Nice Place to Visit – Wikipedia)  People also don’t want total uncertainty, because that would be chaos.  What they want is to be in a state of reducing uncertainty.  An analogy seems in order:  A surfer doesn’t want to be on the shore.  He also doesn’t want to be out on the calm water.  He wants to be riding the wave into shore.  A happy life is then to be understood as action and process, to be in the middle of playing an enjoyable game, and not as a static place.  It also seems that the nature of the uncertainty matters.  Someone who buys fire insurance might still want to enjoy the thrill of a close basketball game.  So, some types of risks cause mostly unhealthy anxiety, and some cause mostly healthy thrill.  My belief is that good risks are those that dovetail with what would have been required activities in the Stone Age, and bad risks are those that don’t.   

(33) The current dominate narrative in America today tells us that revenge and retribution are shocking and beyond the pale.  This isn’t true in all cultures, and since many people are wired to enjoy retribution it might be just as healing.  I think our society’s rejection of retribution and revenge might be analogous to the Victorian society’s purported rejection of sexual pleasure.  While it is true that sexual gratification is potentially a dangerous and destructive thing, witness the AIDS epidemic, in its proper place it is also a wonderful thing.  Perhaps revenge works the same way.  In pastoral societies, where no effective central law exists, cultures of honor develop where justice is founded on the threat of violent retribution for wrongs done.  Under these circumstances vengeance is not only allowed, but required.  (Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South by Richard E. Nisbett)  Today, norms in hard-core prisons work much the same way.  The only thing which protects you is your reputation.  The rule is, “You can lose every time, but you must fight every time.”  As bad as this is, the alternative can be worse.  I also don’t think that a culture of honor is necessarily philosophically morally inferior to a culture of law.  My suspicion is that most Americans would see it that way because they have been trained to.  For whatever political reasons, this is the current consensus.  But if we were to tote up the costs and benefits it isn’t clear to me that one system would clearly win out.     

(34)  In sports they put this way, “Control the controllables.”  For example, in tennis when receiving serve you can’t decide you will take it to your forehand side if he/she serves it to your backhand side.  You also can’t even directly control whether or not you will win the game.  That outcome depends also on what the other person/team does, and you have no control over that half of the equation.  But you can control how well you train.  So arrange your goals around what you can measure and influence.  All the rest of it will happen of its own accord.

(35) These pieces of advice are all attempting to combat low self-confidence.  To introduce a note of reality here, unfortunately lack of self-confidence might all too often arise from people’s accurate perceptions of themselves and their lives.  See foot note 17.

(36)  Repeating foot note 16, one test of whether or not a relationship is toxic for you is to ask yourself if you feel more energized or tired after spending time with that person.

(37) In a radio interview I heard, the speaker opined that a sense of humor can save your life.  For example, when Hitler was in power the Jews told many jokes about him:  “Two Jews noticed that every day Hitler would walk by their shop in the morning.  They devised a plan to get a big rock to drop on his head from the second story of their shop to kill him.  The next day they were waiting with the rock, but at his usual time of 8:00 a.m. he hadn’t come by.  At 9:00 he hadn’t come.  At 10:00 he hadn’t come.  Finally, one of them gets worried and says, “Gee, I hope he’s OK.” (One Life to Give by Andrew Bienkowski)

(38) Here are some random titles to get started: Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, Secrets of Power Negotiating, How To Haggle: Professional Tricks For Saving Money On Just About Anything, Bare Knuckle Negotiating: Knockout Negotiation Tactics They Won’t Teach You At Business School, The Negotiation Toolkit: How to Get Exactly What You Want in Any Business or Personal Situation, Leverage: How to Get It and How to Keep It in Any Negotiation, Practical Negotiating: Tools, Tactics & Techniques, The Haggler’s Handbook: One Hour to Negotiating Power, National Negotiating Styles.

(39) You might start with: Don’t Say Yes When You Want to Say No: Making Life Right When It Feels All Wrong.

(40) Effective problem solving involves a large number of elements.  Here are but a tiny few:  Be proactive.  Don’t wait for a solution, but go out and find one.  Do your homework, and anticipate consequences.  Break the problem down into its sub-parts.  Look for someone else who has solved similar problems.  Look for analogies.  It is worthwhile to keep in mind that successful problem solving also often involves a large amount of domain specific knowledge.  (Talent Is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else by Geoff Colvin In short, there’s often no substitute for really knowing what you’re talking about. (”The Complete Problem Solver” (1981 ed.)), “The Universal Traveler: A Soft-Systems Guide to: Creativity, Problem-Solving, and the Process of Reaching Goals“, Center for Creative Learning, The Myth of Creative Genius – Lost Wanderer, Problem solving – Wikipedia)  

(41) Franklin’s 13 virtues are: temperance, silence, order, resolution, frugality, industry, sincerity, justice, moderation, cleanliness, tranquility, chastity, and humility.   

(42) If you are having trouble getting started on a project one method is to just dive in to get going.   For example, if you are writing a paper put down everything you know, garbage and all, to get started.

(43) Of course it’s always a balance between being too close-minded for the wrong reasons, versus having no ability to filter out nonsense. (See, for example Deconstructionism is Horsesh*t – Lost Wanderer, Freudian Psychology is Horsesh*t – Lost Wanderer)  The only advice I can give in this regard is that there is no substitute for knowing a subject, and to let evidence and reason guide you in deciding what’s nonsense.

(Superme.com, “The Happiness Myth: The Historical Antidote to What Isn’t Working Today” by Jennifer Hecht, “100 Simple Secrets of Happy People: What Scientists Have Learned and How You Can Use It” by David Niven, “Happiness: Unlocking the Mysteries of Psychological Wealth” by Ed Diener, The Politics of Happiness: What Government Can Learn from the New Research on Well-Being by Derek Bok, The How of Happiness: A New Approach to Getting the Life You Want by Sonja Lyubomirsky)

Wisdom of Crowds

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

When you ask a number of people for their best guess about something, such as a date in history, and then you average their guesses, this average will generally be more accurate than the typical person’s guess alone.  This is the basis of the book, The Wisdom of Crowds by James Surowiecki (See also Wisdom of Crowds – Wikipedia) and occurs when the people involved have a diverse knowledge of the topic, and hold a range of views about it.  What is happening is that the random errors between people are cancelling each other out.  For the process to work well you need a diversity of such things as training, experience, and decision models; and that people form their opinions independently of one another.

Using a similar process it turns out that one person can gain a reasonable increase in accuracy by making two guesses, and then averaging them.   The process requires that the person create diversity in their own head, because their accuracy doesn’t increase if they simply makes one guess and then another.  

Here is the protocol researchers designed that does the trick:  “First, assume that your first estimate is off the mark.  Second, think about a few reasons why that could be.  Which assumptions and considerations could have been wrong?  Third, what do these new considerations imply?…Fourth, based on this new perspective, make a second, alternative estimate.” 

Take the two guesses and average them, and the result will be about 50% of the gain you could have gotten if you had averaged your first guess with that of another person’s.  It turns out that your second guess isn’t more likely to be accurate than the first, it’s just that it contains different errors, and so the average of the two guesses is likely to be more accurate.  (You Know More than You Think by Jack Soll and Richard Larrick) (The Wisdom of Many in One Mind: Improving Individual Judgments With Dialectical Bootstrapping by Stefan M. Herzog and Ralph Hertwig)

There is always the risk of people falling in love with some new idea, and at the risk of being a bit silly by stating the all-to0-obvious, while I think that this decision making methodology does have a lot of merit in many cases, it has its limits, and should only be used when more certain sources of information aren’t available.  Crowds can be wrong, shown in many circumstances by the clear facts that confront us.   In those circumstances where more a certain sort of information is available it would be ridiculous to simply take a vote.       

The Math of Love

Monday, October 19th, 2009

Dr. James Murray and Dr. John Gottman have been studying couples for years at the Relationship Research Institute, and have apparently discovered what makes for a happy marriage.  Their methodology involves videotaping couples for 15 minutes, while the partners discuss a potentially contentious topic, such as money or sex.  The couples words and actions are then coded into categories, such as humorous or contemptuous, and then assigned a positive or negative score.  (As you might expect, contempt is a very bad sign.)  

It turns out that the marriage is in good shape if the ratio of positive to negative interactions is 5:1 or greater, and they have found that they can predict which newlyweds will eventually divorce with 90% accuracy.  (Love lasts when the maths (sic) is right by Mark Horstman) (See also For those who are Contemplating Marriage – Lost Wanderer)

Cricket “Tells”

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

Although they can’t say how they do it, top cricketers can predict how a bowler will throw the ball before it is thrown.  Researchers are now trying to see if this ability can be trained.  (Top cricketers play a guessing game)  They seem to do this by subconsciously picking up on the bowler’s subtle ”tells.” 

This sounds similar how a skilled poker player reads his opponents, although that ability is at least somewhat conscious.  (Basic Poker Tells)  Obviously this takes place in other sports as well, and can help explain some of the less obvious reasons why certain players perform better than others.

Freud’s Fellow Kooks

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

Following up on Freudian Psychology is Horsesh*t - Lost Wanderer, I ran across this Discover Magazine article, The Borderline Whack-Jobs Who Pioneered Psychoanalysis  by Dean Christopher, who reviewed the book, Revolution in Mind: The Creation of Psychoanalysis by George Makari. 

As I might have expected, considering what a charlatan Freud was, many of Freud’s followers were also fairly unusual.  Felix Salten, who wrote Bambi, also wrote pornography.  Otto Weininger recommended completely giving up sex for all purposes, and then shortly afterwards killed himself.  Some followers believed that masturbation caused madness, while others believed it cured it.  One got the label the “Pied Piper of carnality.”  Another had to flee his homeland partly as a result of repeated accusations of child molestation, and still another died in jail.  We learn from these deep thinkers that blacks are inherently uncivilizable, syphilis is the co-traveler of Christianity, women are destined for hysteria, Jews are disproportionately degenerate, and the solution for the Jew’s problem was to practice gymnastics. 

In the end, Freudianism serves as a reminder of how insane ideas can foster a cult of fashionable nonsense given the right circumstances.

Schizophrenia

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

The short list of things I would do to try to prevent schizophrenia will sound very familiar to anyone who reads this blog:  Both the future mother and offspring should get lots of vitamin D, should be on a Paleolithic Diet, have hookworms and whipworms, get plenty of sleep, have a good family, and live in a close community.  They should not be exposed to lead, should have low stress, no X-rays, and be of high status.  Neither of them should be exposed to the flu, toxoplasmosis, the Borna virus, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex 2, and syphilis.  They also should avoid tobacco, cannabis, and other illegal drugs.  Also, the father should not be old. 

For a more detailed discussion you can read the rest of this blog entry:    

A diagnosis of schizophrenia is made on the basis of a patient’s symptoms, since there is no laboratory test for it.  Because of this, there is every likelihood that it is actually a cluster of conditions, each with a different etiology.  One school of thought even argues that we should diagnose people in terms of a series of dimensional continuums, instead of having a cut off for a diagnostic category.  Perhaps partly because of the uncertainties involved there many theories about schizophrenia’s ultimate cause.

Before I get to the more mainstream perspectives, I want to touch on the viewpoint of Thomas Szasz.  He’s skeptical of the whole medical model, and argues that schizophrenics have a legitimate way of looking at the world, are simply making people uncomfortable, and that society doesn’t have the right to control people for this reason alone.  (His position is closely related to the reasonable insight that cultural differences influence the rates of diagnosis, and that different cultures have different ways of dealing with the various forms of what we would call mental illnesses.)

My response to Szasz is to say that it isn’t true that schizophrenics are only making people uncomfortable, but that there are potentially lethal consequences in allowing someone who is delusional behind the wheel of a car.  Even if it were the case that schizophrenics universally had no complaints regarding their condition (which, in fact, isn’t true), I think that society should have the right to protect itself from the likely consequences of these people’s, so called, “different equally legitimate patterns of thought,” and in many circumstances it should be able to do so whether or not the schizophrenic agrees.  And, while we’re at it,  if others have to pay the bill for their maintenance, then those who have to work to support them should also have a say in their getting treatment.  If Szasz can show me the hard data that proves that schizophrenics are able to function perfectly well by living up the responsibilities of supporting themselves, of being responsible capable citizens, and they are happy with their condition then I might agree that we should drop the whole concept from the DSM.  But until then, I’m going to see it as a problem. (Schizophrenia – Schizophrenia as a social construct – Wikipedia

Szasz also argues that schizophrenia is simply a social construct, and as such doesn’t actually exist.  It’s true that we pick out those aspects of the world we find important, and package them into the concepts of our languages.  But the world imposes itself upon us, and so it is, at best, misleading to say that by doing so we are engaged in “constructing reality,” as opposed to responding to and taxonomizing it.  Using similar reasoning people have argued that gender doesn’t actually exist either.  (See: Deconstructionism is Horsesh*t – Lost Wanderer)       

Traveling further into la la land, in 1976, Julian Jaynes speculated that schizophrenia was the normal operation of the human mind until fairly recently.  Supposedly, up until about 3,000 years ago, people went around with minimal self awareness much of the time, and every now and then they would hallucinate, and “the Gods” would speak to them, which was actually their verbal left hemisphere sending them a message.  Civilization’s beginning marked the beginning of what we currently call normal self consciousness.  Jaynes’ ideas, like Szasz’s, don’t pass the giggle test, and strike me simply as an example of what has been called “fashionable nonsense,” since no one has ever reported any such observations with hunter gatherer peoples.  (The Legacy of Julian Jaynes by Dan Hartwig) (See also: Schizophrenia – Other proposed causes - Wikipedia)

Moving away from la la land, one theory is that schizophrenia is the price we pay for our large brains’ energy demands.  (Are big brains to blame for schizophrenia?)  Or perhaps it’s the result of our left brain specializing in language.  (Schizophrenia as failure of hemispheric dominance for language by TJ Crow) 

There are many genes which contribute to schizophrenia, (Schizophrenia Risk Gets More Complex) overlapping those that code for manic depression, (Unlocked: the secrets of schizophrenia by Steve Connor) and the fact that schizophrenics have low fecundity raises the question of why the genes that increase its incidence haven’t been selected out.  It could be that there are major advantages to having them, however currently there is no good theory as to what these might be.  It could also be that it’s a recent phenomenon arising out of some change in the relevant triggering environmental factors.  If this idea proves to be correct, it would mean that schizophrenia can be added to the long list of “Diseases of Civilization.”

A very credible candidate as a major cause of the disease is vitamin D deficiency.  John Cannell, of the vitamin D council, makes the case for this by pointing out such facts as the incidence of schizophrenia is much higher in people with dark skin who live at northern latitudes, and there is a 10 fold variance in the rate of schizophrenia that also follows the lines of latitude.  (Vitamin D and Schizophrenia)  Also, in a Finnish cohort study, vitamin D supplementation of at least 2,000 IU/day during a child’s first year was associated with a lower rate of the disease.  (Vitamin D supplementation during the first year of life and risk of schizophrenia: a Finnish birth cohort study)  Vitamin D might explain the fact that schizophrenia varies by the season of a child’s birth. (Relative Risk for Schizophrenia depending upon Month of Birth)  And one route through which Vitamin D could be acting is through its neuroprotective role in cleansing the body of heavy metals, such as lead. (See below) (Vitamin D protective against toxins – Vitamin D and Schizophrenia)

Another candidate cause is milk protein.  In one study 95% of autistic and schizophrenic children had 100 times the normal levels of milk protein in their blood and urine, and 80% of them had their symptoms resolve when they were put on a milk free diet.  (University of Florida Researchers Cite Possible Link Between Autism, Schizophrenia and Diet)

There is some evidence that gluten is the problem for a subset of patients.  (Schizophrenia – Alternative Medical Treatments – Wikipedia and Schizophrenia, gluten, and low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diets: a case report and review of the literature)  Consistent with this, the Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD), which restricts complex carbohydrates and eliminates sugar, has been promoted for a wide variety of diseases, including schizophrenia.  (Specific Carbohydrate Diet – Wikipedia and Everything about The Specific Carbohydrate Diet totally explained)  (The SCD has much in common with the Paleolithic Diet (PD).  However, the PD allows tubers, and doesn’t allow cheese, yogurt, and legumes. (Everything about Paleolithic Diet totally explained and The Paleo Diet))

In the Dutch Famine Study, prenatal nutritional deprivation during the second trimester was found to double the rate of schizophrenia. (Dutch famine of 1944 - Wikipedia and Prenatal Risk Factors in Schizophrenia

Catching the flu in the first half of pregnancy leads to a 3-fold increase in the incidence of the disease, and if a women contracts this disease in the first 13 weeks the risk goes up 7-fold.  Although the nature of why this relationship exists isn’t clear, researchers estimate that 14% of cases might be linked to the flu in this way.  (Womb flu link to schizophrenia)  (See also: Coughs and sneezes spread mind diseases

Another infections organism that might lead to the disease is toxoplasmosis. (Toxoplasmosis Parasite May Trigger Schizophrenia And Bipolar Disorders)  The Borna virus might play a role (Borna Virus by Sean Henahan), as well as catching rubella or cytomegalovirus (a 17-fold risk increase) before age 12. (Prenatal Infection as a Risk Factor for Schizophrenia by Alan S. Brown and Childhood brain infections risk of schizophrenia )  Also, herpes simplex virus 2 (HVS-2) might be a risk factor. (Mother’s Herpes Virus Infection Associated With Schizophrenia In Her Offspring, Hopkins Researcher Finds).  When syphilis became treatable thousands of schizophrenics were cured. (Diseases of the Mind by Janet Ginsburg)  Some researchers believe that schizophrenia is caused by ancient viral DNA that became incorporated into our genome, which then becomes reactivated. (Is schizophrenia caused by an enemy within? by Joanna Marchant)  (See also: Plague Time by Paul Ewald)

A mother’s stress can be a contributing factor.  Looking at a cohort of Israeli children, who were in their second month of gestation during the 1967 Arab-Israeli conflict, for girls there was a 4-fold increase in schizophrenia later in life.  And when researchers looked at the mothers who had been subject to the worst stress of direct shelling they found a 30-fold increase.  (Early pregnancy trauma boosts schizophrenia risk)     

The children of older fathers suffer a slight reduction in IQ (2 points), and are at higher risk for such disorders as schizophrenia (50% more likely), autism and bipolar disorder.  (Children of older dads pay IQ price and Father’s age linked to schizophrenia risk)

Another factor that might increase the rate of schizophrenia is prenatal X-rays.  (X-Ray Radiation during Pregnancy & Early Childhood may increase risk of schizophrenia for child)

Perinatal traumatic events such as obstetric complications have been associated with schizophrenia in retrospective studies, however in the only prospective study done to date no such association was found.  (Prenatal Risk Factors in Schizophrenia by Alan S. Brown)

The use of cannabis and cigarette tobacco is associated with the disease.  Especially in this case I have to wonder about whether this is a causal relationship, or merely the case that those with the condition are more likely to use these products.  (Cannabis Increases Risk Of Psychosis and Brain Disorders, Smoking and Nicotine Addiction – Report Summary (March, 2006))  (See also: Psychiatric epidemiology: searching for the causes of mental disorders  by Ezra S. Susser) 

The same question can be raised about schizophrenia’s association with parental absence during early childhood (Causes of schizophrenia by Stephe Ellis and Children at risk for schizophrenia: a longitudinal perspective By Norman F. Watt), child abuse (Child Abuse can Cause Schizophrenia by Rick Nauert), living in an urban environment (Does the urban environment cause psychosis? and The schizophrenia envirome), poverty, migration, poor housing, racial discrimination, family dysfunction, double bind messages (Double bind – Wikipedia), bad sleep habits (Are bad sleeping habits driving us mad? by Emma Young), prenatal exposure to lead (which might double the risk) (Prenatal lead exposure linked to schizophrenia by Joanna Marchant), and unemployment. (Schizophrenia – Wikipedia, citations 60-65)

Looking more closely at what proximate mechanisms might be involved with the disease, studies indicate that inflammation as part of an overactive immune response is likely involved.  (Anti-Inflammatory Medications May Become A Treatment For Schizophrenia and Immune System Linked To Schizophrenia)  And glial cells, which play a key role in brain development, supporting the neurons, and fighting infection, have been suggested as a cause of the disease. (New schizophrenia theory by Alison Motluk)  (Of course, any mention of an overactive immune response leads me to bring up the topic of helminths as one potential therapeutic and preventive option.) (Autoimmune Therapies)

In looking for ways to develop a test for this disease researchers have noted that people who go on to develop schizophrenia lose their ability to identify smells before any clinical symptoms occur. (Could You Suffer From Psychosis? The Nose Knows) A blood test for schizophrenia might soon be available that is based on RNA molecules expressed from genes linked to the disease.  (Blood test for schizophrenia draws nearer by Marina Murphy)  Using brain imaging, researchers have shown that schizophrenic’s brains are much less reactive to images of bizarre facial images than controls. (Decoding Funny Faces To Detect Mental Illness) And another team of researchers has shown that children at high risk for later developing schizophrenia perform very poorly on tasks related to memory and executive functioning (planning, classifying, and interpreting information).  (Toward A Test For Childhood Detection Of Risk Of Bipolar Disorder And Schizophrenia

As for current treatments, factors which influence the likelihood of recovery include: “1) family relationships, 2) substance abuse, 3) duration of untreated psychosis, 4) initial response to medication, 5) adherence to treatment, 6) supportive therapeutic relationships, 7) cognitive abilities, (8) social skills, 9) personal history, and 10) access to care.”  (UCLA Study Names 10 Keys To Recovery From Schizophrenia

I do not have a citation for the source, but I remember once reading that in the United States years ago patients were treated by going to religious revival meetings.  They were in a supportive environment that made sense of their condition as a result of sin in the world.  This form of treatment was reported to have had a great deal of success until it broke down by being overwhelmed by the increasing number of patients.  Apparently a Hindu Temple can accomplish the same thing.  Researchers report that patients who spent six weeks in a temple had as much improvement as a month long course of standard drugs.  The secret is apparently a community that gives people a supportive environment, in tune with their own cultural beliefs, along with the hope of recovery.  (Temple treatment for psychiatric illness by Anil Ananthaswamy, Bangalore)

Looking at the more invasive types of treatments, researchers have found that electroshock can be productively combined with conventional drug therapies, making them more effective. (Electroshock Therapy Speeds Improvement In Schizophrenia Patients)   

An interesting fact about schizophrenics is that they see through the “hollow mask illusion.”  In controls communication between the parietal cortex, which is involved in the top-down control processing of visual information, and the lateral occipital cortex, which is involved in bottom-up processing, increased when the hollow faces were presented.  This did not happen with schizophrenics, which indicated that these different areas of the brain were unable to communicate normally. (Hollow Mask Illusion Fails To Fool Schizophrenia Patients

For those who might want to know what it’s like to be a schizophrenic, one doctor has recreated the experience of schizophrenia in a virtual second-life type of world.  (A Lever to Move the Mind)

Finally, to end on a somewhat positive note, some genes that increase the odds of schizophrenia also appear to increase creativity.  (Artistic tendencies linked to ’schizophrenia gene’ by Ewen Callaway)

Synesthesia

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Synesthesia (Synaesthesia) is a mental phenomenon in which sensory and cognitive information from one domain elicits a response in another.  Two of the most common forms are the perception of different numbers and letters as having their own individual colors, and also seeing the days of the week as colored.  There are 60 known types, and about 1/23 people have some form of it.  It isn’t a medical condition, but simply another way of experiencing the world.  One theory that tries to account for it holds that it is the result of undampened neurological feedback leaking from one sensory channel to another. 

It can be an aid to memory, (The Mind of a Mnemonist: A Little Book about a Vast Memory by Aleksandr R. Luria) and researchers speculate that it might explain certain metaphors people use. (The Meaning of Metaphor by Jason Lanier

For those who don’t naturally have it and want to experience it, it can be induced through a variety of medical conditions including temporal lobe epilepsy, stroke, and brain tumors.  Also, some illegal drugs will often do the trick, such as LSD, mescaline, and psilocybin.  For the less determined, sensory deprivation and some prescription meditations can create the condition. (Synesthesia – Wikipedia, Synesthesia: A Film by Jonathan Fowler, SynesthesiaSynesthesia- Wellsphere, and Wednesday is Indigo Blue by Richard E. Cytowic)

An unusual type of synesthesia is touch-emotion, which has only two known cases.  For one of the subjects the tactile experience of denim causes feelings of depression, disgust, and worthlessness.  Corduroy causes confusion, while silk leads to contentment.  For the other person tennis balls, fresh leaves, and sand are heaven.   (Tactile-emotion synaesthesia)  Another interesting form is emotion-color synesthesia.  Researchers believe that when people report that they can see people’s auras they might actually be seeing colors in response to their emotional reactions to the person and situation.  (My favorite aunt is purple and Seeing someone’s aura may be just a quirk of the brain)

Predictors of Success for People with Learning Disabilities

Monday, October 5th, 2009

The literature on the predictors of success for individuals with learning disabilities (LD) reminds me a bit of what makes a person lucky (How to Be Lucky), and what make a difference in who survives a disaster. (Survival)  Researchers have found that six main attributes explain between 50% and 75% of the variance between successful and non-successful LD persons.  These are self-awareness, being proactive, perseverance, emotional stability, appropriate goal setting, and use of social support. 

Successful LD people are self-aware, that is, they have a realistic appraisal of their strengths and weaknesses, and accept their disability.  Successful LD people know they will always have it, but they find ways to compartmentalize and work around it.  This might involve finding a niche job where their LD doesn’t matter much, or getting others to do those parts of the job they aren’t good at and thereby avoiding areas where they are weak.  If they can, they will capitalize on a special ability or interest.  Those who aren’t as successful either don’t have the wherewithal to choose career paths in this way, or they can’t because their LD is too global.  Successful LDers also compartmentalize their LD psychologically, by not defining themselves in terms of it.  “Just because I am bad at some things doesn’t mean I am bad at everything.  LD is just one aspect of me.” 

They are proactive, that is they are actively engaged in decision making about their lives.  They believe they can exercise significant control over, and make a difference in, their life outcomes.  They seek out advice, and use social support networks to provide them with honest and informed feedback.  They make decisive decisions, and take responsibility for the consequences of them.  They anticipate problems, and actively deal with them by finding technical, organizational, and academic ways to solve them.  Less successful people are more passive, and tend to merely respond to events.    

Successful learning disabled people exhibit both perseverance in the pursuit of their general goals, and great flexibility in the specific means of achieving them.  They don’t stubbornly stick to a failing plan based on some sort of simplistic rule involving something they think they ought to be doing.  They will try to find a way around an obstacle, and not beat their head against it.  They know when to quit a losing plan, and look for other solutions to the problem.  They will change their major, their job, or their university if it’s necessary.  They might try a number of approaches simultaneously to see what works.      

They use a variety of means to manage their emotional lives.  They recognize their triggers and find ways to avoid, reduce, and cope with them.  Typical strategies might involve the use of social support, taking medications, taking cooling off breaks, rotating activities to prevent stress from building up, planning ahead for difficult situation, keeping away from negative or critical persons, and having contingency plans.  They don’t dwell on failure, but instead see failure as a learning experience.

Successful LDers set realistic and appropriate goals across multiple domains of life, involving such areas as education, employment, family, personal, and the spiritual.  They make plans to reach their goals in well thought out specific concrete steps, yet as mentioned above, they are flexible and adapt when necessary.  The less successful LD person won’t typically engage in much planning, and will often have vague, unrealistic, and grandiose plans. 

Successful LD persons will use support systems consisting of significant others who have clear and realistic expectations of them, and who serve as sounding boards for reality checking.  They will seek help when needed from people who can be trusted to aid them in identifying realistic goals, and who will suggest changing direction if necessary. 

Another characteristic of successful LDers is that over their life cycle they often tend to gradually move from dependence to independence, while the less successful never manage this transition.  Many of them end up finding ways of reciprocating and giving back.  Successful LDers also tend to be late bloomers, and to come from very supportive families.

The fact that successful LDers tend to come from very supportive families reminds me that relatives tend to share characteristics because they share both genes and backgrounds.  If a family is very supportive this indicates they have the financial, intellectual, and emotional capital to be so.  This means that they are probably more successful on average, and this, in turn, means that genes that lead people to be more successful were also likely passed on to their successful LD children.  (Is Everyone a Little Bit Crazy? & Dishonoring the Family Name)  So, successful families will have more successful LD children both because of the support they can give, and the advantageous genes they have passed on to their children. This makes sense, because, if you look at the above list, these are characteristics which would tend to lead to success for just about anyone in any area of life.  (Predictors of Success in Individuals with Learning Disabilities: A Qualitative Analysis of a 20-Year Longitudinal Study by Roberta J. Goldberg, et al.)  

 

 

Your Body’s Biological Rhythms and Your Health

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

Circadian cycles, menstrual cycles, and seasonal cycles guarantee that the biology of the human body isn’t constant throughout the day, the month, or the year.  Building on this fact, chronotherapy is the practice of coordinating the taking of medical drugs and treatments with our biological rhythms.   In one study it was found that scheduling breast cancer surgery at different points in a woman’s menstrual cycle changed the likelihood of tumor reoccurrence after 5 years from 76% to 63%.  Other diseases, such as asthma and arthritis, follow daily patterns, and timing medication doses can maximize blood levels of medications during the worst daily phases of them.  (A time to Heal: Chronotherapy Tunes into Body’s Rhythms)  And taking chemotherapy at the right point during the day has been found to boost its cancer treatment effectiveness while minimizing side effects.  (Circadian rhythms boost cancer therapies

Not respecting our body’s natural rhythms can create a host of problems.  Researchers have found that people who repeatedly disrupt their normal circadian cycle over years could be suffering shrinkage of their temporal lobes, and this in turn seems to affect short term objective memory and simple abstract cognition.  Previous work has suggested that such disruptions might also affect heart disease and breast cancer risks.  One reason why this could be is that the pineal gland secretes melatonin at night, and disruption of this system has been implicated in cancers. (Jetlag ’shrinks the brain, Artificial lighting in the industrialized world: circadian disruption and breast cancer by Richard G. Stevens, and (Shortness of Dark by Allen Bellows)  At night the body stays awake by activating the stress response, and this in turn weakens the immune system.   The scheduling of surgery from morning to afternoon can affect the rate of adverse health events due to anesthesia, and part of this could be due to people being at different points of their cycles.  (Time of Surgery Influences Rate of Adverse Health Effects Due to Anesthesia)  There is even the concern that exposing infants to constant light prevents infants from developing normal circadian rhythms to begin with.  (Artificial Light and the Biological Clock)

Michael Smolensky, et al., even advocate that people should construct their own personal “chronorecord,” which is a recording of all their cycles.   In this way a person can synchronize their internal clock with their health care and other various activities.  (The Body Clock Guide to Better Health: How to Use Your Body’s Natural Clock to Fight Illness and Achieve Maximum Health (Paperback) by Michael Smolensky)

PT-141, a True Aphrodisiac?

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

I previously mentioned Melanotan II in my blog on sun protection, but it seems that it had so many (beneficial) effects, sun protection, decreased inflammation, weight loss, and increased sex drive, that researchers decided that it wouldn’t be effectively marketable.  (Perhaps I haven’t heard the whole story, but that sounds like another example of a world gone mad, if a drug has too many good effects it won’t be marketable!)   

So they played around with the molecule until they came up with PT-141, which for a while looked as though it might turn out to be the first real body-shaking aphrodisiac for both genders.  It worked by going straight to the brain, and patients reported such things as feeling good, younger, more energetic, having “this humming feeling,” a tingling and warmth, and a strong desire to have sex.  I first heard about PT-141 in 2005, and wondered how things had turned out.  

By 2008 development of the drug was stopped after it was found to raise blood pressure in a number of test subjects.  They later tried a subcutaneous method of delivery, which seems to have solved this problem, and negotiations with the FDA for phase II trials of this method of delivery are ongoing.  So, for now it’s being developed as a treatment for shock due to blood loss. 

The company is also working on a similar molecule and aphrodisiac, PL-6903, which doesn’t have any problematic blood pressure side effects.  So, for a while longer the world will just have to wait to see how this all turns out.  (Wikipedia – Melanotan II, Is the World Ready for Libido in a Nasal Spray? Wikipedia – Bremelanotide, Bremelanotide Bulletin)