Posts Tagged ‘Dysfunctional Behaviors’

Anorexia & The Secret Language of Eating Disorders by Peggy Claude-Pierre

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

I first heard about The Secret Language of Eating Disorders on the TV show 20/20.  At the time the author claimed 100% cure rate, and although I’ve since read that some of her former clients relapsed, she still appears to have a remarkably high success rate.  If you read the reviews, anorexics say that she understands how they think, that anorexia is a kind of very slow suicide. 

Critics point out that she only has a B. A. degree and isn’t scientifically rigorous in her approach, but given the failure of experts to cure this condition, I think those are fairly weak criticisms if she really has had the success she claims.   

One Spoonful at a Time by Harriet Brown is the on-line personal story of a mother’s desperate coping with her daughter’s anorexia.  She reports using the Maudsley approach in which family members sit with patients at mealtimes calming and encouraging them to eat.  Studies show a 90% success rate with this method, and the techniques used sound similar to Claude-Pierre’s approach. 

In her article Brown discusses an interesting 1940s study by Dr. Ancel Keys, who put 36 men through a year long study of starvation.  Especially during the refeeding phase of Keys’ study, the volunteers became depressed, antisocial, anxious, irritable, and obsessional, just like anorexics.  One insight which was learned from this was that the psychology of starvation in the midst of plenty isn’t the same as when there isn’t any food around, which is why you don’t see anorexia in deprived populations.  

Risk factors for the condition are: the person is naturally slender, they find it easy to diet, is a perfectionist, lives in the United States, and is in an activity such as ballet which encourages thinness.  Finally, one of the reasons why relapse is so common is that once the disease has progressed anorexics become metabolically inefficient, the weight loss becomes self-feeding to some extent, and the patient needs more calories than other people to maintain or gain weight.

Delusions as Strategic Deception

Sunday, July 19th, 2009

I ran across this article by Edward H. Hagen, “Non-bizarre Delusions as Strategic Deception” which looks at 5 classes of delusions that he argues are the outcome of evolutionary selection for status enhancement of very low ranking individuals in a community.  The 5 delusions are: paranoiac, grandiose, erotomanic, somatic, and jealous.  What makes these “non-bizarre” delusions is that for a given individual a belief falling into each of these classes could in fact be true.  Someone might really be after you.  You might have special knowledge.  An important person might be in love with you.  You could really be blind or lame.  Your mate might be unfaithful.  But, given the particulars of the specific individual’s case, their beliefs are clearly wrong.  

Hagen argues that what all these classes of delusion have in common is that they would have been likely to have garnered aid from others in the Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness (EEA), and that very low ranking individuals who developed these conditions would have preferentially survived.  Over time his would have led to those genes that coded for such delusions to have been selected for.  And it turns out that given the right conditions about 50% of people will develop such delusions.  Such persons are very resistant to treatment because this isn’t a case of the brain doing something it wasn’t designed to do, but the brain actually working correctly. 

It turns out that there is one thing that will cure the person.   They will inevitably recover if their status is significantly raised.  It makes sense, because this is what the mechanisms are designed to accomplish, and if they accomplish their task then there is no reason for the delusion to persist.

I’ve known two people who developed paranoiac delusions, both of whom were failing badly in life at the time of the development of their conditions.  The best liar is someone who doesn’t know he is lying.  What makes it clear that the people are sincere in their beliefs, and that this is an involuntary process, is that, while the mechanisms at work might have been adaptive overall in the EEA, in today’s world they just make the individual’s situation worse, and yet the person persists in really believing in them.

Conversational Terrorism

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009

This site lists numerous ways people can use cheap tricks to be obnoxious and manipulate conversations.

“I’d like to respond to that, but taking into account your background, education, and intelligence, I am quite sure that you would not be able to understand.”

“You support capital punishment because of a deep-rooted death wish common among those who have suffered emotional traumas during childhood.” 

“Have I ever brought up the $523.52 you owe me? Never! Have I ever embarrassed you or made you feel bad over it? Have I ever told you how much I need that money? No, I never have.” 

“I have observed that those who disagree with me on the next point tend to be unsophisticated, and those who quickly recognize the validity of the point to be more educated. The point is….”

“I’m not sure if I fail to disagree with that or not.”

“Let’s just say we knew for sure you were a sexual pervert…”

“If I hear you correctly your point is…” (get it all wrong)